--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Peter" <bornloser1537@...> wrote:
>
> It is a matter of required bankroll. Playing 9/5 JOB (or any other 98.5-98.9% game), instead of 9/6 JOB, requires a larger bankroll to play the same number of hands. It may be a small amount, but it does matter (at least to me it does).
>
> As someone else noted, recreational players are not (always) idiots. I try to wring as much out of our gambling budgets as I can. I seek out the best paytables I can find, in concert with where I want to play. The short term risk of ruin computation tells me how much I should bring to play the number of hands I want to.
>
Well I don't play 98.5-98.9 games either. I'm just wondering what the big incentive is for casinos to put in 99+ games that come close to break-even when including benefits and when played by competent players. Especially when the casino has already made a conscious effort to remove them. Sure, I think they're going to be around for a long time still, but as I've noted elsewhere the game is changing and will continue to change. I'm looking at these Franknbob machines like they represent "hope" for the future.
[vpFREE] Re: M. Prog. - Was: Seats added at M
__._,_.___
.
__,_._,___