Re: [vpFREE] Re: Want to get 86'd?

 

kcace1024 wrote: "I also witnessed the "kid' playing 2 machines. He did not hit the buttons hard, it was sort of like watching someone play the piano."

That sounds a lot like Frank Kneeland. He looks and acts much younger than his true age. He is also, rumor has it, the fastest video poker player alive. He is so fast he's embarrassed to talk about it.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___
Posted by: nightoftheiguana2000@yahoo.com
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a New Topic • Messages in this topic (7)

.

__,_._,___

Re: [vpFREE] Re: Bankroll question

 

vp_wiz wrote: "Still, when it comes down to it, the derivation of Kelly numbers is not sourced from ROR calculations."

??? There is no ROR with the Kelly system. There is risk, perhaps that's where I lost you. Anytime you have a gamble there is risk. With the Kelly system there is no risk of RUIN (ROR).

The bottom line is that we hear all the time: "don't overbet your bankroll". But what does that mean in terms of hard numbers? You seem to be saying that several percent of risk of ruin is OK. How many percent? Many Kelly gamblers, but not all, consider betting more than the optimum Kelly bet to be overbetting. How is this applied to video poker? If you only gamble with the portion of your bankroll that is over the optimum Kelly bankroll (approximately betsize x variance / edge), you will never bet more than the optimum Kelly bet (approximately bankroll x edge / variance) and by this definition you will never overbet your bankroll, and your risk of ruin is zero. What do you do with the rest of your bankroll? You find a lower risk gamble that puts some of it into play. Or you wait until you can build it back up again with contributions from your day job.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___
Posted by: nightoftheiguana2000@yahoo.com
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a New Topic • Messages in this topic (33)

.

__,_._,___

[vpFREE] Vegas Values Report - 25 JAN 2015

 

Vegas Values Report - 25 JAN 2015

http://www.americancasinoguide.com/vegas-values/vegas-values-report-for-january-25-2015.html

or

http://goo.gl/r9aiZt

*************************************************
This link is posted for informational purposes
and doesn't constitute an endorsement or approval
of the linked article's content by vpFREE. Any
discussion of the article must be done in
accordance with vpFREE's rules and policies.
*************************************************

__._,_.___
Posted by: vpFREE3355 <vpfree3355@gmail.com>
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a New Topic • Messages in this topic (1)

.

__,_._,___

Re: [vpFREE] Re: Want to get 86'd?

 

I wonder who bothers most people the worst. The fast button basher that's been described or the player that hits the max play button which goes ding, 5 times EVERY hand & then lets the machine count EVERY coin of the payout. I especially luv sitting by penny slots & the guy/girl that hits a coupla hundred $ payout, then lets it ding for the next minutes (or more). I know my answer.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___
Posted by: denniseudaley@yahoo.com
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a New Topic • Messages in this topic (6)

.

__,_._,___

Re: [vpFREE] Thanks to ljlute60 for the photos

 

Thank you, thank you, thank you! 幸運 (good luck) to you and everyone else in this group also!!!

> On Jan 24, 2015, at 12:28 PM, mcuddington@hotmail.com [vpFREE] <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
> I don't recall seeing anyone by that name posting messages, but the jackpot pics are the stuff of fantasies. Whoever you are, keep 'em coming! I could not imagine playing at that level, but can enjoy it vicariously through the stream of jackpot photos you've provided for so long. I often wonder if other people browse through those, like I do, with jaws dropping ;-)
>
> May you have many more!
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___
Posted by: Lute <ljlute60@yahoo.com>
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a New Topic • Messages in this topic (2)

.

__,_._,___
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)