Re: [vpFREE] Re: The Dice Challenge

 

mjperr82@yahoo.com wrote:

>since it depends on a prior win to engage the bet and the prior bet to get the win is subject to the EV of nsud (99.73) so is the double up bet as you doubling up 99.73 not 100

The payback of the game has nothing to do with the payback of the
double up bet.

__._,_.___

Posted by: 007 <007@embarqmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (35)

.

__,_._,___

[vpFREE] Re: The Dice Challenge

 

since it depends on a prior win to engage the bet and the prior bet to get the win is subject to the EV of nsud (99.73) so is the double up bet as you doubling up 99.73 not 100

and you are right it is inconsequential to say the least , lol ,


now trying to explain that a pair of dice has 2 ways to make an 11 , one dice=5, 2nd dice= 6, / one dice=6, 2nd dice=5 , can be frustrating or profitable ; )


MJ

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___

Posted by: mjperr82@yahoo.com
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (34)

.

__,_._,___

Re: [vpFREE] Was -- Re: The Dice Challenge Now: Double Up

 

greeklandjohnny@aol.com wrote:

> In the above example, you have 500 coins wagered at an expected return on 99.73% so your expected coin out is 498.65 coins. You now also bet 500 coins on double up and your expected coin out from that bet is 500 coins.

mjperr82@yahoo.com implied that the expected coin out of the double up
was 498.65 coins.

__._,_.___

Posted by: 007 <007@embarqmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (33)

.

__,_._,___

[vpFREE] Re: Was -- Re: The Dice Challenge Now: Double Up

 

Well do you get comps and or tier for double up play?

__._,_.___

Posted by: cdgnpc@aol.com
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (32)

.

__,_._,___

[vpFREE] Re: Slot Machine Science

 

I would like to see her write an article that further explores the nature
of the casino itself. She touches on the subject discussing how all turns
in the casino are curved. No 90 degree angles as that makes your mind have
to think and can break the spell the casino has on you. There are so many
considerations that I would like to see discussed...why the specific carpet
patterns?...low level casino lighting allowing the machines lights to stand
out...neon signs in the middle of machine groups...parking and rest room
availability...all sorts of things. She says how the layout of the casino
is one of the most thought out things for a casino but then does nothing
about really going into what has to be thought about. This article was
'Slot Machine Science'. I would like to see an article 'Casino Science.'
Stu

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___

Posted by: S Merrian <sauronsboy@gmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (2)

.

__,_._,___

[vpFREE] Was -- Re: The Dice Challenge Now: Double Up

 

Harry, anything that helps a perosn understand probability in gambling I think is of some use and a worthwhile use of brain power.


The question on Double Up EV is more a question of semantics than probability. It's all in how you define the particular EV in which you are interested. If you are looking at the EV of all your money in play for a given 100 hand sample, adding Double Up will increase the overall percentage EV of the money you have in play for that session. Playing 100 hands at 99.73% return and 46 hands at 100% return will increase your overall average percentage return but since you are putting more money in play, you will win or lose the same amount.


Let's say you play 100 hands of NSUD ( 99.73%), and get the following hand distribution ( quick auto play on Winpoker), 1 SF, 9 quads, 4 full house, 1 flush, 4 Straight, 27 trips and 54 whiffs. You happen to break even on this particular short session.


Regardless of whether you double up or not, your results from the NSUD portion are the same. Unless you are one of those people who believes that when you hit the keys actually changes your expected results. That notion aside, the NSUD portion of the play only determines how often you have an opportunity to double up. The NSUD EV of the game is determined by the pay table. The Double Up EV of the game is determined by its 'paytable'. Regardless of whether you double up 1 time, 10 times or 46 times, the EV of the Double Up Feature is 100%. It is just a question of how often you double up.


In the above example, you have 500 coins wagered at an expected return on 99.73% so your expected coin out is 498.65 coins. You now also bet 500 coins on double up and your expected coin out from that bet is 500 coins.


For the 1000 coins wagered ( Double Up plus NSUD), your expected return is 998.65 coins or 99.865%. Seems like double up is a good idea. Unfortunately, you are risking twice as much money so your expected loss is the same 1.35 coins. All you have done is increase the amount in play and thus the variance.


I think it is a pretty interesting exercise ( my wife thinks I'm weird).


In summary, adding a 100% return play to a given, less than 100% play will increase the percentage return but not the actual coin return, due to increased wager size. It's the same argument as the odds on the pass line in dice.


Now , if the discussion is whether to play 200 hands of NSUD or 100 hands of NSUD with double up ( same expected coin in for both activities), that is a different discussion

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___

Posted by: greeklandjohnny@aol.com
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (31)

.

__,_._,___