RE: [vpFREE] Proper hold JOB 3 card royal vs. 4 card flush?????

 

Bob wrote: "It's actually 98.37% --- which is quite a bit less than around 99%. Still, it's a valid consideration. ... Royals come about every 51,500 hands using this strategy rather than 40,000. It's not "totally" safe --- but it's safer."

Good points, but let me correct myself a bit. Actually 0-9-6 is the better strategy, you get it by setting the royal to 0 on a strategy generator, such as the wizard's. The result is a royal cycle of 77,750, almost double the maxEV royal cycle. The return as such is 97.95% . I made the assumption you would actually be playing for an 800 royal, and that you would accept that, so adding that back in: 800/77,750 = 1.03% additional for a net 98.98%, almost 99%.

http://wizardofodds.com/games/video-poker/strategy/calculator/

__._,_.___

Posted by: nightoftheiguana2000@yahoo.com
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (14)

.

__,_._,___

RE: [vpFREE] Proper hold JOB 3 card royal vs. 4 card flush?????

 

NOTI wrote: The 250-9-6 Jacks strategy is a good "under the radar" strategy, you still get around 99% return but with substantially less royals. Why would you want to purposely get less royals? Dealing with W2G's would be one reason. What's wrong with W2G's? Taxes and identity theft, for one, and heat and reduced offers, for two. 


 

It's actually 98.37% --- which is quite a bit less than around 99%. Still, it's a valid consideration.



one reason to use this strategy is if you are picking up free play for somebody else while playing for stakes that would generate a W2G for a royal. Although some casinos tolerate you playing on somebody else's card (and some only on spouse's cards), other casinos will take revenge by kicking both of you out after paying off the jackpot. If you had a "lot" of free play (say $1,000 or more) to pick up and didn't have an hour's time to play it off on quarters, using this strategy on a $1 or $2 denomination might be a "mostly safe" alternative. (You can't play $5 unless the straight flush pays 239 coins rather than 250. Getting a W2G every 9000 hands is MUCH too often if you're trying to keep a low profile.)



Royals come about every 51,500 hands using this strategy rather than 40,000. It's not "totally" safe --- but it's safer.


Bob

__._,_.___

Posted by: Bob Dancer <bobdancervp@hotmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (13)

.

__,_._,___

RE: [vpFREE] Proper hold JOB 3 card royal vs. 4 card flush?????

 

aclinmil wrote : "I just got Winpoker for my Iphone and did NOT changed the coins from 1 to 5. ergo the payoffs were based on the 250 coin return for the Royal."

The 250-9-6 Jacks strategy is a good "under the radar" strategy, you still get around 99% return but with substantially less royals. Why would you want to purposely get less royals? Dealing with W2G's would be one reason. What's wrong with W2G's? Taxes and identity theft, for one, and heat and reduced offers, for two. Also getting the royal is a longshot, fine if you're planning on playing for awhile (probably millions of hands per tax year) but in today's hit it and split environment where you should play at as many casinos as possible and as little as possible at each (just enough at the right time to get the promo) you're better off concentrating on the short term, imho of course. 250-9-6 Jacks strategy would also be the mathematically optimal strategy for min-cost-royal and close to the Kelly optimal if you're getting around 2% total kickbacks.

__._,_.___

Posted by: nightoftheiguana2000@yahoo.com
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (12)

.

__,_._,___

[vpFREE] Yahoo Groups Procedures

 

nudge51 wrote:

> As I am thinking on this, I may have supplied a chart to
> the administrator to put in the files section. I am not
> going to look, as it it use to irritate me when I went
> there, as every single file that I have ever submtited and
> was put in the files section, the administrator did not show
> me as the contributor of the information, but just listed it
> as being supplied by vpFREE.

It has always been my policy to give credit where credit is due,
if possible.

However, Yahoo shows the ID of whoever uploaded a file to the
vpFREE Files directory as the uploader, and that's not something
I have any control over.

vpFREE Administrator

__._,_.___

Posted by: vpFREE3355 <vpfree3355@gmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)

.

__,_._,___

Re: [vpFREE] Proper hold JOB 3 card royal vs. 4 card flush?????

 

Well, thanks Bob.  I wanted to make a follow up post just for clarity.  I believe that most players, when they delve into learning a new game strategy, will try to do it from a top down standpoint, learning the higher paying hands first and working their way down the list.  I think this is personal preference, so I am not making a judgment one way or the other, but I have always tended to concentrate more on the lower third of a strategy in a new game more than the top third of a chart.  For me, the holds in the top third seem to be more obvious and intuitive than some of those toward the bottom of playable holds.  In addition, those lower ranked holds and resulting paying hands will show up a hell of a lot more often than the higher paying hands toward the top of the list and my thinking has always been that I damn sure better know how to play the hand choices that I see the most often when playing.  That being said, when Bob mentioned the ten as a penalty for filling two pair, my original reply was not considering the ten as the penalty to the holds in question.  Whether Mike chooses the 3 ROY or the 4 FLU in his example, he will be keeping the ten in both cases.  My point was that the only penalty card to completing a straight on the draw in the example cited was the jack.  As I stated, it could have been any paint (face card) that would deplete the deck of that card on the draw.  I hope that a player using either the bottom up or the top down schooling method will know and understand that when talking about a pair of tens or two pair on a draw is already overridden by the fact that any 3 ROY hold is going to be superior to any non paying pair in 9-6 HOB, regardless of what the fifth card in the hand is, so I consider this heading toward comparing apples to oranges territory.  Of course, if the fifth card is also another club, it will be a pat flush, so take the 30 credits and move on.  Perhaps I did not properly correctly convey  what I was attempting to say, or Bob misread what I wrote.  Don't feel alone, as I will occasionally experience an electrical cranial short circuit when words make the journey from my brain to the keyboard.  By the way, I did receive a private email about the fact that my little chart uses almost all caps and can be considered yelling on a forum.  I think the note was in jest, but in case some of you p.c. correct folks on typing on your p.c. (here we go with the acronym thing again), chill out, cuz I am likely not p.c. on most things, but I really don't care.  I have found over the course of time, with my better half anyway, that using caps on a chart somehow seems to make it adhere in her mind better, so mission accomplished.
                                                                                                        Nudge
    
 
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 4:44 AM
Subject: RE: [vpFREE] Proper hold JOB 3 card royal vs. 4 card flush?????
 


I haven't seen Nudge for several years now. I used to run into him at a couple of casinos I don't visit anymore (Gold Coast and Sam's Town). Anyway it's good to have him back here posting again --- even occasionally.
The list he posted of when 4-card flushes were superior to 3-card royals got 2/3 of them --- and the most important ones at that. But on a hand that starts out with a suited AKT2 and the fifth card is an off-suit T, you can't accurately call that T a straight penalty. It's actually a "two pair penalty" --- because it makes it harder to end up with two pair.
Seedub's "offsuit, unpaired, and higher than a 9" is 100% accurate.
Bob


__._,_.___

Posted by: "nudge51" <nudge51@cox.net>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (11)

.

__,_._,___

RE: [vpFREE] Proper hold JOB 3 card royal vs. 4 card flush?????

 

Thank you Bob and Nudge........Bob was correct. I just got Winpoker for my Iphone and did NOT changed the coins from 1 to 5. ergo the payoffs were based on the 250 coin return for the Royal. I feed pretty stupid about it.

Thank you Nudge.....I have always played the same strategy for Bonus poker as I did for JOB. Your strategy sheet will come in handy...

And thank both of you for the strategy for when a 4 card flush beats a 3 card royal. it's really not that hard to remember.......

Wife and I are coming up on Saturday, staying a couple of nights at the 'D', the El Cortez, and Main St. Station. Pretty good perks at all three of those casinos when playing JOB or Bonus Poker.......

Thanks again, guys. I do appreciate the help.

Mike

__._,_.___

Posted by: aclinml@yahoo.com
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (10)

.

__,_._,___

[vpFREE] Re: Baltimore Host

 

One more tip: Instead of contacting Horseshoe Baltimore directly, ask your host at your "dominant Caesars casino" to make the arrangements.  I've heard from others who have been successful doing this.

Darryl

 
Darryl D. McEwen, Publisher
http://www.sevenstarsinsider.com

Follow us on Twitter: @7StarsInsider

__._,_.___

Posted by: "Darryl D. McEwen, Seven Stars Insider Publisher" <sevenstarsinsider@gmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (6)

.

__,_._,___

RE: [vpFREE] Proper hold JOB 3 card royal vs. 4 card flush?????

 

I haven't seen Nudge for several years now. I used to run into him at a couple of casinos I don't visit anymore (Gold Coast and Sam's Town). Anyway it's good to have him back here posting again --- even occasionally.

The list he posted of when 4-card flushes were superior to 3-card royals got 2/3 of them --- and the most important ones at that. But on a hand that starts out with a suited AKT2 and the fifth card is an off-suit T, you can't accurately call that T a straight penalty. It's actually a "two pair penalty" --- because it makes it harder to end up with two pair.

Seedub's "offsuit, unpaired, and higher than a 9" is 100% accurate.

Bob


 

__._,_.___

Posted by: Bob Dancer <bobdancervp@hotmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (9)

.

__,_._,___

Re: [vpFREE] Proper hold JOB 3 card royal vs. 4 card flush?????

 

I guess I should add for anyone that might not find it obvious...if that unsuited card that is higher than 9 happens to make a high pair, you hold that high pair instead.  I didn't mention it originally because if you are accustomed to playing JoB, holding a high pair over four flushes and over RF3s should already come instinctually.

__._,_.___

Posted by: seedub49@yahoo.com
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (8)

.

__,_._,___

Re: [vpFREE] Proper hold JOB 3 card royal vs. 4 card flush?????

 

I don't think it's that much harder to remember that you hold a four flush over RF3 if the RF3 has an Ace and 10 AND the unsuited card is higher than 9...

__._,_.___

Posted by: seedub49@yahoo.com
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (7)

.

__,_._,___

Re: [vpFREE] Proper hold JOB 3 card royal vs. 4 card flush?????

 

Hey Mike,
   I don't post here much anymore, but I opened my vpFREE mail folder looking for something else and I happened to remember your handle from years ago, so let e give you the whole story.  This is one of those single exception types to a formula that is strictly penalty card related.  In 9-6 JOB, there is only one type of a specific hand that is greater than a 3 ROY hold, and the penalty card is also specific.  The 3 ROY hold must consist of an ace and a ten and one other suited paint card, so that it is a three card royal, but only two of the cards are high cards.  The penalty card that you must have in order for the 4 FLU  hold to be higher, is a straight penalty to the only straight that you can complete on the draw if you don't hit a flush or a royal.  It will be easy to spot, as it must be a face card.  If you are using Winpoker and click on analyze, and then any hand, when you enter all the cards, it should give you the proper hold for a max bet hand.  In your example, Ac, Kc,4cTc, and 7h, the 3 ROY would be the superior hold as the 7h is not a penalty card to a T-K straight.  Run the same hand and trade the 7h and use a Jh instead, and now you will see the exception as the 4 FLU  is now the better hold, as the jack is definitely a straight penalty to a T-A straight, the only one that can be filled on a draw.  On such a close play, when you decide to hold the 3 ROY, it becomes a miniscule error because you are tossing the off suit jack which will now no longer be available to fill a straight on the draw.  Please don't lose any sleep over this as if you are playing for dollars and decide to shoot for the big one, it will only cost you a little more than three and three quarter cents, and playing the quarter game , the cost is slightly less than a penny.  Some of the paid gurus that might be reading this now are popping a vein in their collective necks, but if you are a recreational or vacation player, go ahead and try for the big one, hold, hit, and hope, just like the rest of us do.  As I am thinking on this, I may have supplied a chart to the administrator to put in the files section.  I am not going to look, as it it use to irritate me when I went there, as every single file that I have ever submtited and was put in the files section, the administrator did not show me as the contributor of the information, but just listed it as being supplied by vpFREE.  I no longer speak to him as I have better uses for my time.  Way TMI, but instead of checking, I am just going to paste the little chart that I made some years back that some players may derive a benefit from  When I was schooling my better half on two similar games, 9-6 JOB and 8-5 BP, there were many days that we would wind up playing both games on the same day, so I tried to make a complete chart that would show the subtle differences in both of these games that I made a pocket sized copy that she could quickly review when switching to the new game.  First, for ease of reading, I do not use S for suited.  I was always fearful of going that route when trying to help a novice player, as the single letter can be misconstrued to mean the spades suit.  This became more of a problem when a friend and I were working quite a lot on strategies for one eyed jacks are wild ( are you still around, shadowman?).  Anyway, since one of the wild jacks was the spades, I got used to the s abbreviation for that.  I just use  ( ) to indicate suited cards.  For example, if I show (TJ)  > JQ on a chart, I am saying that suited TJ is greater than unsuited JQ.  Now there are occasions, like in 7-5 SAB prog. that I may show at a certain royal amount—TJ > 568.  If you would see no ( ) on either one of these, that would indicate that both sides are suited, albeit not with each other.  I'm not a big fan or the use of the i for gaps either.  I just state the number of gaps as I am not that hard up for space.  When I see 0i, 1i, and 2i, it starts to look like a foreign language.  Don't even go to the 3i.  That is an alien from a horror movie anyway.  Besides, we have done enough damage to the English language in recent years by using a three or four letter abbreviation for far too many things that I cant remember.  Not a week goes by that we watch one of the cop dramas and the M.E.( I know that one, medical examiner) spews out something that I have to back up the D.VR. (see what I mean!!!) to play it again to figure out what the hell they were trying to say.  Anyway, I am pasting my little chart here and hope it may help a few of you novice players on the differences between jacks and bonus poker.  Hey, besides that, it's free.  I'm an old tarheel formerly from Rocky Mount and I ain't got no product to promote or nothing to upgrade you to anyway.  I have underlined the one hand listing that is this discussion, the next to the last entry on my chart.  I am old school when it comes to learning and memory.  I use the S.I., S.I, R.I., W.I. method.  OK, now I'm just yankin yur chain.  That would be se it, say it, read it, write it.  The more you can do these the better it will stay in your mind
                                                                Nudge
9-6 JOB VS 8-5 BP
 
IN JOB 3 STFL OPEN 0 HI > ANY 2
     CARD ROYAL                     
IN JOB (8JQ), (9JK), (9QK), > AKQJ--IN
     BP, ONLY (8JQ) IS > AKQJ
IN JOB  (TJ) w ANY ST PEN  & NO FLU
     PEN  > JK--IN BP (TJ) w 7 ST PEN
     ONLY & NO FLU PEN IS > JK
IN JOB (TJ) EVEN w ST & FLU PEN
     IS > JA--IN BP JA IS > (TJ)
IN JOB (TQ) w ANY ST PEN & NO FLU
PEN > QA--IN BP QA IS > (TQ)       
     w OR w/o ANY PEN
IN JOB  3 STFL 1 HI 2 GAPS &  0 HI 1
     GAP > JQ > (TJ) & IN BP
     JQ > (TJ) > 3 STFL 1 HI 2 GAPS &  0
     HI 1 GAP *  
       *- EXCEPT (7TJ) > (TJ)
IN JOB 3 BYC. STFL w ACE > JQ --IN BP
     JQ > 3 BYC. STFL w ACE
IN JOB  (78J) > JQK-- IN BP JQK > (78J)
IN JOB (JQ) > (JQ)KA w NO 9 ST PEN
     or FLU PEN--IN BP (JQ)KA IS
     ALWAYS > (JQ)
IN JOB KT w FLU PEN > K ONLY IF NO
     9 ST PENALTY--IN BP K IS
     ALWAYS > KT w FLU PEN
IN JOB 4 FLU w 3 ROY, 2 HI w T & A +
     ST PEN > 3 ROY-- IN BP 3 ROY, 2 HI
     w T & A + ST PEN > 4 FLU
IN JOB (234), (235), & (245) IS > Ace & IN
     BP Ace IS BETTER EXC w a 7-T FLU
     PEN TO Ace
 
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 12:24 PM
Subject: [vpFREE] Proper hold JOB 3 card royal vs. 4 card flush?????
 


I've been playing full pay JOB for years ever since I learned the intermediate strategy. I was always under the impression that a 3 card royal was higher than a 4 card flush in MOST situations. However.... when I put in a few hands into Winpoker, it always comes out with the 4 card flush being higher than the 3 card royal!!

Example.......if I put in A clubs, King clubs, 10 clubs, 4 clubs, and 7 hearts......Winpoker shows the 4 card flush to be much higher than the 3 card royal..... with the 4 card flush earning 1.27 coin return to 0.77 coin return for the 3 card royal. It comes up this way with most any different 3 card royal cards....

I know I have to be missing something simple here. Can anyone set me straight????

Thanks,
Mike


__._,_.___

Posted by: "nudge51" <nudge51@cox.net>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (6)

.

__,_._,___