[vpFREE] Re: Full pay job at ellis island

 

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "hartbarger11"  wrote:
>
> The machines that were downgraded at ellis island in the
> last month or so are now full pay again.  All denominations
> on these machines are now 9/6 job.  These are located right
> in front of players club.

These have new stickers saying they are no longer eligible for point multipliers.

__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (5)
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

Re: [vpFREE] Bob Dancer's LV Advisor Column - 15 JAN 2013

 

I've gone from a young man with 20/7 vision (yep -- almost impossible) to 20/15 with glasses.
When my distance vision began to deteriorate in 2005 (right when the eye doc said "I don't think your vision will deteriorate"), I started making the rounds of LASIK docs. They all said I wasn't a good candidate, because I would have to trade off my then-excellent up-close vision for the improved distance. And as I aged, that up-close vision would be much worse, they promised.

So I got glasses while I noticed lots of former four-eyed critters, like Bob Dancer, dumped theirs and got zapped. So not fair.

Well now my up-close sight is going to crap. Time was the cat sniffing my face was perfectly in focus; I could to read a miniaturized 10-7 Double Bonus strat card with no help, no problem. Good thing I memorized it, cuz it's pretty tough to read now.

No cataracts (yet), but seems I'm just continuing my steady ride down Blurry Road. Maybe before I go totally blind they'll have replacement lenses that work.

They have artificial hearts. How hard can it be?

Sent from TC's iPad

On Jan 15, 2013, at 3:17 PM, vpFREE Administrator vpfree3355@gmail.com> wrote:

> Bob Dancer's LV Advisor Column - 15 JAN 2013
>
> "The Eyes Have It"
>
> http://www.lasvegasadvisor.com/bob_dancer/2013/0115.cfm
>
> *************************************************
> This link is posted for informational purposes
> and doesn't constitute an endorsement or approval
> of the linked article's content by vpFREE. Any
> discussion of the article must be done in
> accordance with vpFREE's rules and policies.
> *************************************************
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (4)
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

Re: [vpFREE] Bob Dancer's LV Advisor Column - 15 JAN 2013

 

I'm 63 and had lazik when it was first introduced after RK (using a small knife) in 1995. My problem was I was always in airports and had to keep putting the glasses on in order to see the flight boards. I could see up close perfectly before the surgery. Afterwards and to this day (and I was told this prior) my distance vision is near perfect, and I need glasses to read. I considred the trade-off worthwhile. BTW, back then it was $4000/eye, but I got the procedure in just before my work insurance stopped covering it 100%.

----- Reply message -----
From: "James Thompson"

There have been great improvements since 2005 when I was rejected for Lasik. On my recent visit, I was told I was now a candidate for it. I've also been wearing glasses for 40 plus years.

__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic ()
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___