Poker News, Poker Updates, P0k3r, FREE Video Poker, Pay Video Poker, Online Poker, Poker *. Poker Everything! Poker Madd!!!
Scot Krause Strictly Slots Article - NOV 2011
The Gift Giving Season
http://www.casinocenter.com/?p=2234
<a href="http://www.casinocenter.com/?p=2234">
http://www.casinocenter.com/?p=2234</a>
Thanks for you reply...we did get a name, but didn't think about the email. Will call back for that.
Seemed weird to me at all that they were willing to give us a 2 bedroom suite when there were only 2 of us showing...maybe they figure husbands and wives fight a lot in Vegas and need to sleep separately...LOL
I wasn't aware that the Roman Tower had suites...I think that tower is more centrally located (closer to casino) which is nice for me.
I'm really hoping we won't have issues...our confirmation still shows that room I self booked for us (Palace Tower Premium).
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Barf Bag <barf_bag_007@...> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> I would always get the name of the host and ask them to send me an e-mail with the details they told me and of course, the confirmation number. I had a 2 bedroom suite in the Roman Tower once (after the rooms were updated) and it was quite nice with multiple bathrooms and multiple jetted tubs, one which was very large and deep. Before the Augustus and Octavian Towers were built, I stayed in the Palace Tower, sometimes with a Junior Suite (2 bathrooms but one bedroom), almost exclusively and I prefer the jetted tubs there over the Augustus Tower ones.
> Call back and speak with the same host to verify that's it's imperative that your friends will be accomodated, too, one way or another.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
They are Sovereign. The tribe can only voluntary submit to determination of what "excluded" means. They make their own rules and have their own courts to settle disputes.
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "NeilG" <neilgrund@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "vegasvpplayer" <vegasvpplayer@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Tabby Cat <tabbycat@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > *Barred or excluded individuals are not eligible for FREEplay offers,
> > > promotions or *jackpot winnings*.
> > >
> >
> >
> > That message was printed at the bottom of my last email from them. That's one joint where I'm definitely not going to let my point balance get too high.
> >
> Not that it really matters, but I believe that "excluded" would be those compulsive gamblers that have either voluntarily or been court ordered to be placed on an exclusion list, are are not allowed to be in a casino.
>
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "vegasvpplayer" <vegasvpplayer@...> wrote:
>
>
> --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Tabby Cat <tabbycat@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > *Barred or excluded individuals are not eligible for FREEplay offers,
> > promotions or *jackpot winnings*.
> >
>
>
> That message was printed at the bottom of my last email from them. That's one joint where I'm definitely not going to let my point balance get too high.
>
Not that it really matters, but I believe that "excluded" would be those compulsive gamblers that have either voluntarily or been court ordered to be placed on an exclusion list, are are not allowed to be in a casino.
YES!!!!!!!!!!!!
________________________________
From: vegasvpplayer <vegasvpplayer@gmail.com>
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 11:22 AM
Subject: [vpFREE] Re: In what Atlantic City casinos can I find full pay machines?
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, kellypkjoe <kellypkjoe@...> wrote:
>
> you must nit have read my email. It was church's not wanting gambling and the 100% games was the compromise. Laundering had nothing to do with it. Laundering money on 100% machines would stick out like a sore thumb. And their much better was to launder it anyways.
>
>
Actually I was speaking about the reason I have heard for states in general not allowing 100%+ games, not NJ specifically. In the case of NJ, why did the church oppose 100%+ games? Did they fear it would compete with their "charity" church bingo games?
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Some have been known to use under 50% lotteries to launder
'dirty' money. A mob wife put a big part of a million into a
lottery ticket machine to try and get half back 'clean'.
I guess the story goes she never hit, AND they popper her
and her husband for even trying.
--- On Mon, 11/21/11, MHS <mspevack@optonline.net> wrote:
From: MHS <mspevack@optonline.net>
Subject: Re: [vpFREE] Re: In what Atlantic City casinos can I find full pay machines?
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, November 21, 2011, 10:37 AM
On 11/21/2011 11:08 AM, Vegasvpplayer wrote:
>
> <<<<I've always wondered about this. Sure, I've heard the same thing
> about no 100% machines being allowed by law, but I've never seen such
> a law in print, and I've always wonder wtf do they care?>>>
>
> FWIW, the most common reason I've heard given is to reduce money
> laundering concerns.
>
As if a fraction of a percent would matter to the launderers as much as
it does for vp players.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
<<<99.54% JoB 1-2-3-4-6-9-25-50-800 JoB (FP)
(2) $1, $2, $5 1 Play TITO Slant in high limit slot area, facing cage
99.17% BP 1-2-3-4-5-8-25-40-80-50-800 BP (FP)
$1, $2, $5 3/5 Play TITO Slant in high-limit room >>>
The above games have all been downgraded.
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, kellypkjoe <kellypkjoe@...> wrote:
>
> you must nit have read my email. It was church's not wanting gambling and the 100% games was the compromise. Laundering had nothing to do with it. Laundering money on 100% machines would stick out like a sore thumb. And their much better was to launder it anyways.
>
>
Actually I was speaking about the reason I have heard for states in general not allowing 100%+ games, not NJ specifically. In the case of NJ, why did the church oppose 100%+ games? Did they fear it would compete with their "charity" church bingo games?
On 11/21/2011 11:08 AM, Vegasvpplayer wrote:
>
> <<<<I've always wondered about this. Sure, I've heard the same thing
> about no 100% machines being allowed by law, but I've never seen such
> a law in print, and I've always wonder wtf do they care?>>>
>
> FWIW, the most common reason I've heard given is to reduce money
> laundering concerns.
>
As if a fraction of a percent would matter to the launderers as much as
it does for vp players.
The trip continues with some birthday celebrations, a pantload of
Pick'em, and some nice VP hits.
http://www.royalflushervegas.com/2011/11/happy-birthday-quad-queen.html
http://www.royalflushervegas.com/2011/11/ask-me-whos-your-royal-flusher-daddy.html
--
Las Vegas the Royal Flusher Way!
www.royalflushervegas.com
you must nit have read my email. It was church's not wanting gambling and the 100% games was the compromise. Laundering had nothing to do with it. Laundering money on 100% machines would stick out like a sore thumb. And their much better was to launder it anyways.
________________________________
From: Vegasvpplayer <vegasvpplayer@gmail.com>
To: "vpFREE@yahoogroups.com" <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 8:08 AM
Subject: [vpFREE] Re: In what Atlantic City casinos can I find full pay machines?
<<<<I've always wondered about this. Sure, I've heard the same thing about no 100% machines being allowed by law, but I've never seen such a law in print, and I've always wonder wtf do they care?>>>
FWIW, the most common reason I've heard given is to reduce money laundering concerns.
Sent from my iPhone
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
<<<<I've always wondered about this. Sure, I've heard the same thing about no 100% machines being allowed by law, but I've never seen such a law in print, and I've always wonder wtf do they care?>>>
FWIW, the most common reason I've heard given is to reduce money laundering concerns.
Sent from my iPhone
