--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, kellypkjoe <kellypkjoe@...> wrote:
>
> you must nit have read my email. It was church's not wanting gambling and the 100% games was the compromise. Laundering had nothing to do with it. Laundering money on 100% machines would stick out like a sore thumb. And their much better was to launder it anyways.
>
>
Actually I was speaking about the reason I have heard for states in general not allowing 100%+ games, not NJ specifically. In the case of NJ, why did the church oppose 100%+ games? Did they fear it would compete with their "charity" church bingo games?
__._,_.___
MARKETPLACE
.
__,_._,___
