Re: [vpFREE] Downtown Deuces at El Cortez

 

ii made my card off wolf video poker.


On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 17:14, 'Queen of Comps' queenofcomps@cox.net [vpFREE]<vpFREE@yahoogroups.com> wrote:  
Someone has asked me about where to find a strategy for that game, He says it is not on VP for Winners? Is that right??? If so, where can I direct him?
------------------------------------------
Jean $¢ott, Frugal Gambler
http://queenofcomps.com/
http://jscott.lvablog.com/
UPDATED TAX BOOK
(Download 2015 eBook now)

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___
Posted by: m h <kickboyface@yahoo.com>
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a New Topic • Messages in this topic (6)

.

__,_._,___

Re: [vpFREE] Downtown Deuces at El Cortez

 

Yes. An RF4 + 1 deuce. Thanks.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___
Posted by: roaches@austin.rr.com
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a New Topic • Messages in this topic (5)

.

__,_._,___

Re: [vpFREE] Downtown Deuces at El Cortez

 

Assuming that you are talking about having 1 deuce. You would not, unless it was a progressive royal that was getting around $5,300.

Regards
A.P.

________________________________
From: "roaches@austin.rr.com [vpFREE]" <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 9:14 PM
Subject: Re: [vpFREE] Downtown Deuces at El Cortez

Speaking of deuces...

I think my question pertains to all DW variations. If dealt a wild royal, does one sacrifice the 125-credit "bird-in-hand" and draw to the RF4? I haven't found a strategy that addresses my question.

Thanks.

Pat Roach

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___
Posted by: Albert Pearson <ehpee@rogers.com>
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a New Topic • Messages in this topic (4)

.

__,_._,___

Re: [vpFREE] Downtown Deuces at El Cortez

 

Speaking of deuces...

I think my question pertains to all DW variations. If dealt a wild royal, does one sacrifice the 125-credit "bird-in-hand" and draw to the RF4? I haven't found a strategy that addresses my question.


Thanks.


Pat Roach

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___
Posted by: roaches@austin.rr.com
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a New Topic • Messages in this topic (3)

.

__,_._,___

Re: [vpFREE] Downtown Deuces at El Cortez

 



Regards
A.P.

________________________________
From: "'Queen of Comps' queenofcomps@cox.net [vpFREE]" <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
To: vpFREE <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 8:14 PM
Subject: [vpFREE] Downtown Deuces at El Cortez

Any program that allows you to change the pay schedule can do Downtown Deuces. There aren't any extra paylines to worry about.

Someone has asked me about where to find a strategy for that game, He says it is not on VP for Winners? Is that right??? If so, where can I direct him?
------------------------------------------
Jean $¢ott, Frugal Gambler
http://queenofcomps.com/
http://jscott.lvablog.com/
UPDATED TAX BOOK
(Download 2015 eBook now)

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___
Posted by: Albert Pearson <ehpee@rogers.com>
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a New Topic • Messages in this topic (2)

.

__,_._,___

[vpFREE] Downtown Deuces at El Cortez

 

Someone has asked me about where to find a strategy for that game, He says it is not on VP for Winners? Is that right??? If so, where can I direct him?
------------------------------------------
Jean $¢ott, Frugal Gambler
http://queenofcomps.com/
http://jscott.lvablog.com/
UPDATED TAX BOOK
(Download 2015 eBook now)

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___
Posted by: "Queen of Comps" <queenofcomps@cox.net>
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a New Topic • Messages in this topic (1)

.

__,_._,___

[vpFREE] Re: Boyd YAH Wed bonus - 30x VP DOES exist...

 

I don't think casinos target actual "names" anymore, it's too easy for players to change names and disguises or recruit family members or others to play instead, not to mention libel suits like the one against Griffin. Most casinos target what they think are "winners" and most casinos make the common mistake of assuming that someone who hits a taxable or jackpot must be a winner. It's also probably easier for them to just look through the taxable records and exclude the top 10 or whatever. This is not a smart business move on the part of casinos, assuming they are looking to increase gambling, but it is what it is. Banks are doing a similar thing in excluding customers with a lot of cash transactions on the assumption that they must all be drug dealers. The truth is some customers with a lot of cash transactions are just degenerate gamblers looking for a safe place to stash their gambling bankroll, and many gamblers with a lot of taxable jackpots are likewise just degenerate gamblers, losing more than they win over the long term. These are actually valuable customers, and if you're looking for customers, these would be the types you want for your business.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___
Posted by: nightoftheiguana2000@yahoo.com
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a New Topic • Messages in this topic (10)

.

__,_._,___

[vpFREE] Re: Bob Dancer's LVA Column - 5 JAN 2016

 


I'll respond to cdgnpc by saying that's certainly the impression I strive to leave with each casino (re play non-discretion) ...

But, seriously, qualification for airfare is strictly a matter of established theo at most any casino that strives to bring in "out of towners". In other words, even playing the best games in the house it's theoretically possible to qualify with enough coin-in.


---In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, <cdgnpc@...> wrote :

I think this angle is past its heyday based on the reaction when someone says they still get airfare. I am sure people still get it but not the ones that are selective about their play.





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___
Posted by: harry.porter@verizon.net
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a New Topic • Messages in this topic (6)

.

__,_._,___

RE: [vpFREE] Re: Bob Dancer's LVA Column - 5 JAN 2016

 



Lol...probably!!!.. I know someone that will remain nameless that ..pulled off drivers changed..rode in with the limo..one person stayed in car they came in!! Met them at the airport.. Same thing going home. Said the perks were worth it!!..☺

Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device

-------- Original message --------
From: "cdgnpc@aol.com [vpFREE]" <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
Date: 1/6/2016 9:56 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [vpFREE] Re: Bob Dancer's LVA Column - 5 JAN 2016

 

I think this angle is past its heyday based on the reaction when someone says they still get airfare. I am sure people still get it but not the ones that are selective about their play.

Is the limo perk a way to make sure you came and left on a flight?

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___
Posted by: mail4caryl <mail4caryl@yahoo.com>
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a New Topic • Messages in this topic (5)

.

__,_._,___

[vpFREE] XVP, Carrentals.com rental car codes

 


Got these in an email. Don't know if you have to book through carrentals.com or not. Expire 1/31/16

Budget up to 25% off. D775001

Avis up to 30% off. A233401

Hertz, $5 off per day. 306353

Dollar 15% off a weekly. 101026

And the payless SWP060 still works. Enter it in the second field of the coupon code section. Good for 10% off. I thought it got you SWA miles as well but I haven't seen those post to my account.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___
Posted by: greeklandjohnny@aol.com
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a New Topic • Messages in this topic (1)

.

__,_._,___

[vpFREE] Re: Bob Dancer's LVA Column - 5 JAN 2016

 

I think this angle is past its heyday based on the reaction when someone says they still get airfare. I am sure people still get it but not the ones that are selective about their play.

Is the limo perk a way to make sure you came and left on a flight?





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___
Posted by: cdgnpc@aol.com
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a New Topic • Messages in this topic (4)

.

__,_._,___

[vpFREE] Re: Bob Dancer's LVA Column - 5 JAN 2016

 


I get a little twitchy when Bob posts an article like this. Bottom line, I think it primarily serves to make any casino manager who follows his column (and I suspect that's more than a couple) just a tad more nervous that they're being taking advantage of on yet another front.

A little paranoia can go a long way ...

Setting aside that consideration, I differ markedly from Bob's perspective on airfare: He considers it just another component of a play's EV, and as such is inclined to maximize reimbursement, subject to certain moral bounds that he goes on to highlight (letting the reader "draw the line" themselves).

In my case (and from what he writes, it appears that airfare reimbursement is a greater factor in my play, "stuck" in the middle of a non-gaming state - GA), I consider the perk a side benefit (much as I might consider the quality of dining or pool facilities at a hotel where I'm staying).

I don't want to "cross the line" over which someone might eventually decide I'm abusing a handsome privilege. If I'm receiving reimbursement from two properties, I'm inclined to structure that reimbursement so as not to exceed my out-of-pocket cost, at times revealing that I have multiple reimbursements.

One exception to this "honesty" is that more than occasionally I find that a casino will pop for limo transportation, but won't pick up an alternative car rental (even up to some reasonable set limit). I've gathered that they don't want to subsidize any expense that might take you away from the casino during a stay, particularly if that alternate destination might be another casino.

Where this is the case and a car rental is a considerable time or expense saving option, I may pad the reimbursement structure to make me whole for the car.

The truth is there's nothing other than my own judgment prompting this restraint on reimbursement. I've no doubt that the greater body of "all you can eat" players would go for every penny you can grab. I'm simply a great believer in "what goes around, comes around".


---In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, <vpfree3355@...> wrote :

Bob Dancer's LVA Column - 5 JAN 2016


Airline Fare Redemption


http://www.lasvegasadvisor.com/bob_dancer/2016/0105.cfm http://www.lasvegasadvisor.com/bob_dancer/2016/0105.cfm







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___
Posted by: harry.porter@verizon.net
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a New Topic • Messages in this topic (3)

.

__,_._,___
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)