Re: [vpFREE] XVP - Lao Sze Chaun review

 

On Wed, 24 Sep 2014, Misscraps misscraps@aol.com [vpFREE] wrote:
> We ordered scallion pancakes as an appetizer, one of my favorites, and
> they were excellent. One flaw though, no dipping sauce for the pancakes.

These are a favorite of mine too (mom used to make them on weekend
mornings when I was a kid, so there is sort of a Proustian thing going on
there).

In my experience they aren't generally served with sauce (though some
people seem to mechanically put soy sauce on any Chinese food). From time
to time I have seen them accompanied by a peanut sauce but since that is
more of a Thai food thing it is hard for me to consider that authentic...

__._,_.___

Posted by: Lone Locust of the Apocalypse <zorak@ninthbit.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (2)

.

__,_._,___

[vpFREE] XVP - Lao Sze Chaun review

 

I can't give you a complete review because my husband and I don't like Spicy food and a lot of it in the Palms new restaurant is spicy. But we asked for non-spicy dishes, which should have been possible since Mandarin as well as Szechwan are in the menu. But our experience was a C Minus, not just because of the food, but because of the some want scattered service. For one thing, no deserts were available, apparently they are still on order. Just why they couldn't come up with some ice cream to serve is beyond me (or bake some almond cookies?).
We ordered scallion pancakes as an appetizer, one of my favorites, and they were excellent. One flaw though, no dipping sauce for the pancakes. After I requested dumpling sauce at least, the waiters seem confused, and took their sweet time and a second request to bring some. By then most of the pancakes were gone. The sauce wasn't very good either, just an overly vinegar mix of vinegar and soy sauce.
Also had wonton soup, which was tasty, but too peppery and salty. Too bad because otherwise it would have been good.
Then came shrimp with lobster sauce. But the plain rice we ordered to go with it didn't arrive. Again we had to make a second request, and it came too late. On the East Coast this dish always has a white sauce, but here, like elsewhere in Vegas, the sauce is red and doesn't have much lobster flavor. It did have a strong hint of chili, despite our request for non spicy food. Fortunately the chicken with mixed vegetables (finally) arrived, and that was excellent and non-spicy.
The prices were moderate, only $12.95 for the chicken with vegetables for example. The menu is quite large, with many dishes and appetizers. Unfortunately it apparently was misprinted, and doesn't list some of the chef's specialties such as shrimp with lemon sauce, which do appear on the lunch menu (so ask for both menus if you go).
They are open from 10 am to 11 pm and serve dim sum 10-4. We will have to go back for that because we love dim sum.
Hopefully some of the problems (like no desert) will be fixed in a few weeks. By the way, the restaurant has been totally refurbished from Little Buddah days, including removing some of the stepped up areas. There is no sushi bar anymore (sigh). Decor is still very nice.
Little Buddah was our favorite restaurant in Vegas, and we would go 3-4 times a month. Unfortunately this new replacement is no replacement for us, but if you enjoy spicy Szechwan food you will probably enjoy it. Whether this restaurant will bring in the Chinese gamblers that the Palms wants remains to be seen. Some better signage to the restaurant would help.
By the way, the Palms other restaurant that used to be Guardunos and then a "women's sports bar" remains closed, with no signs of remodeling at this time.
What they probably should have done was tear out both restaurants to make a new and better buffet and make the buffet into a Chinese restaurant. The buffet continues to be mediocre at best. At least with discounts it is cheap.

__._,_.___

Posted by: Misscraps <misscraps@aol.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)

.

__,_._,___

[vpFREE] New Royal Flusher Trip Report

 

For those of you who like to read Royal Flusher's trip reports, he just started writing a new one about his July trip. Here's the start of it -

http://www.royalflushervegas.com/p/kenny-and-lulu-trip-report.html

__._,_.___

Posted by: "H. F." <sector7up2@yahoo.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)

.

__,_._,___

[vpFREE] Re: XVP: Trip Report: Six Nights in Las Vegas Starting Sept 12 2014

 

 
>> I got $5.00 of free slot play for signup and after running it through kept $2.50 of it. Next I played 25c Full Pay Pick-A-Pair (P-A-P) aka Pick'Em for a while and won $40. That ended gambling for the day down $238 and down for the trip $583.<<<
 
Very good trip report...and some very useful information...good to hear that there's something worthwhile to play at the SLS (any place that has full pay Pick 'Em/Pick-a-Pair is going to have me as a regular).



__._,_.___

Posted by: RWHANNU@aol.com
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (6)

.

__,_._,___

[vpFREE] Last week's Gambling With an Edge radio show

 

I still find it incredible that Loveman is supposed to have done a study that proved the average gambler can't tell the difference between a loose and a tight slot and this is why Harrah's has the tightest slots in the industry. First off, you can't just group slots together, they are mathematically very different. Now, if you take a high payout, low frequency slot like MegaBucks, and you change the return by changing the top jackpot, of course the average gambler can't tell because the average gambler never plays enough cycles to actually get the top jackpot. But if you change the return by changing the frequently hit smaller jackpots, the average gambler can tell because this directly affects "machine time", i.e. the average amount of time say a $20 bill will last on the machine before being depleted. Any video poker player who has played some video poker (at least a royal cycle) knows this directly as you can tell the difference between 9/6 jacks and 8/5 jacks just by how frequently you have to feed the machine, likewise for 15/9/5 deuces versus 15/9/4 deuces. A similar effect occurs on many video slots, which is why the first generation Buffalo was so popular (it was set very loose, perhaps by mistake). The Wizard of Odds has demonstrated that it is relatively easy in the smart phone era to get the return of a slot that has frequent payoffs. Second, the statement was made that if you ignore debt and other fixed costs, Harrah's slots have the highest hold in the industry. Well, of course, because they are the tightest. So, of the people who play, Harrah's makes the most money per spin. But of course this is why Harrah's has so much competition and has never been able to dominate a market in the Loveman era, because they leave the business wide open to casinos that offer looser slots and get all the business from the gamblers who can tell. The casinos with the looser machines don't hold as much per spin, but they more than make up for that with more play time per machine and more customers. And the customers exhibit more loyalty and are less likelier to walk across the street or whatever to the Harrah's because it's well known on the street that Harrah's has the tightest slots in the industry. Harrah's does have a generous slot club, but of course they have to try harder to get gamblers to play tight slots and try to keep them from walking out to the loose slot casino next store. The fact that Harrah's repeatedly fails once competition moves in shows that their slot club is not loose enough to support their tight slot policy. Instead they are forced to go further into debt to build yet another casino in a market that does not yet have any competition.



__._,_.___

Posted by: nightoftheiguana2000@yahoo.com
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)

.

__,_._,___