[vpFREE] Re: Bob Dancer's LVA - 5 MAY 2015

 

O
Only a fool would assume that a vp machine with auto-hold, for which the underlying strategy is unqualified, employs an optimal strategy. (Of course, casinos and fools hold a strong attraction to each other.)

Frankly, I see no reason why such a strategy need be optimal, or even near-optimal. There are no explicit or implied warranties to that effect.

My own vested interest in the subject would desire a sub-optimal strategy that creates room for an advantageous play.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___

Posted by: harry.porter@verizon.net
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (3)

.

__,_._,___

Re: [vpFREE] Bob Dancer's LVA - 5 MAY 2015

 

In my opinion the manufacturer should be declaring what level of strategy the auto hold is using.
i.e. They could say that the strategy they are using is 100% perfect strategy, or 99.7% strategy or any other type of a strategy that they choose.
As long as they declare what they are doing I don't see why any reasonable person would have a problem. If they don't declare what they are doing then one could play it for a while and look at the suggested holds and then determine if they like that method of play or not.

Regards
A.P.

From: mailto:vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 1:32 PM
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [vpFREE] Bob Dancer's LVA - 5 MAY 2015

Bob Dancer's LVA - 5 MAY 2015

More on Auto-Hold

http://www.lasvegasadvisor.com/bob_dancer/2015/0505.cfm

*************************************************
This link is posted for informational purposes
and doesn't constitute an endorsement or approval
of the linked article's content by vpFREE. Any
discussion of the article must be done in
accordance with vpFREE's rules and policies.
*************************************************

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___

Posted by: "Albert Pearson" <ehpee@rogers.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (2)

.

__,_._,___

[vpFREE] Bob Dancer's LVA - 5 MAY 2015

 

Bob Dancer's LVA - 5 MAY 2015

More on Auto-Hold

http://www.lasvegasadvisor.com/bob_dancer/2015/0505.cfm

*************************************************
This link is posted for informational purposes
and doesn't constitute an endorsement or approval
of the linked article's content by vpFREE. Any
discussion of the article must be done in
accordance with vpFREE's rules and policies.
*************************************************

__._,_.___

Posted by: vpFREE3355 <vpfree3355@gmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)

.

__,_._,___

Re: [vpFREE] Scot Krause's Slot Club Spotlight - 5 MAY 2015

 

<<<Once you become a Club Palms established player, you can expect a monthly mailer with offers based on your previous play.>>>>

Expecting a mailer may lead to disappointment if you've had a win for the associated qualifying period.

Sent from my iPhone
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___

Posted by: Vegasvpplayer <vegasvpplayer@gmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (2)

.

__,_._,___

[vpFREE] Scot Krause's Slot Club Spotlight - 5 MAY 2015

 

Scot Krause's Slot Club Spotlight - 5 MAY 2015

Club Palms slot levels change quickly

http://gamingtoday.com/articles/article/53642-Club_Palms_slot_levels_change_quickly#.VUjY6CFVhBc

or

http://goo.gl/ww6CV1

*************************************************
This link is posted for informational purposes
and doesn't constitute an endorsement or approval
of the linked article's content by vpFREE. Any
discussion of the article must be done in
accordance with vpFREE's rules and policies.
*************************************************

__._,_.___

Posted by: vpFREE3355 <vpfree3355@gmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)

.

__,_._,___

[vpFREE] Scot Krause's Real Deals - 5 MAY 2015

 

Scot Krause's Real Deals - 5 MAY 2015

Aliante's MRKT has Mother's Day deal

http://gamingtoday.com/articles/article/53628-Aliante_s_MRKT_has_Mother_s_Day_deal#.VUjYaiFVhBc

or

http://goo.gl/ECiLUx

*************************************************
This link is posted for informational purposes
and doesn't constitute an endorsement or approval
of the linked article's content by vpFREE. Any
discussion of the article must be done in
accordance with vpFREE's rules and policies.
*************************************************

__._,_.___

Posted by: vpFREE3355 <vpfree3355@gmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)

.

__,_._,___

[vpFREE] XVP Riviera Closing

 

Report and pictures from the last morning.
http://tinyurl.com/jwt9777
Photo Essay
http://tinyurl.com/lrqy6q3

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___

Posted by: royalflusher@gmail.com
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (4)

.

__,_._,___

[vpFREE] Re: JW Double down stud?

 


I don't have hard data at hand, but I believe the "8s or better" version of JW is one of the worst JW DDS variants found. (Think 90%-91% ER)

My guess is that the only profitable strategy is not to play.



---In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, <billvolk11@...> wrote :

I just played some 8s or better JW DDS at a casino that sometimes has bonus point days. Since you only double your bet ( and get coin in credit) during your advantage at over a 100% return = dealt 8s or better and open straights, flushes and A<K<Q<J unsuited, What CB / promo would you need to make this a profitable game - N>B> losing a few % on original 5 coin plays ?


it is over 700,000-1 to hit a royal so that is not a big factor





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___

Posted by: harry.porter@verizon.net
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (2)

.

__,_._,___