O
Only a fool would assume that a vp machine with auto-hold, for which the underlying strategy is unqualified, employs an optimal strategy. (Of course, casinos and fools hold a strong attraction to each other.)
Frankly, I see no reason why such a strategy need be optimal, or even near-optimal. There are no explicit or implied warranties to that effect.
My own vested interest in the subject would desire a sub-optimal strategy that creates room for an advantageous play.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
__._,_.___
Posted by: harry.porter@verizon.net
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (3) |
.
__,_._,___
