Peter, I couldn't agree more with everything you've stated in the accurate summation
below. I think that you've hit the nail squarely on the head, with every point that you
made. Thanks for a GREAT post!
~Babe
----------------------------------------------------------
From: jaywilly240 <wha724@comcast.net>
Subject: [vpFREE] Re: M Progressives
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, July 2, 2011, 9:34 AM
<<Recent discussions here revolving around the M's giant progressive experiment succinctly underscore the basic differences between VP pros and recreational players.
To the progressive oriented pro, math is math. 103% is 103%. The pro will learn the strategy required to achieve that return, allocate the funds necessary and go to work.
And for the pro it is work.........................................................
...............It seems to me that a casino like the M could easily accommodate pros,
rec players and everybody in between. In addition to the progressives already in place, management could offer a selection of 99+% games, and then watch the bottom line effects of the behavior of the rec players attracted by them.....................
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
