Look at it this way! If you hold the AT and you get the 3 intermediate cards in the right place, you will be estatic, if you only hold the A and the other 3 come up in order, oh well?
Assuming you will get a royal (conditional probability) there are 3X2X1 way for those 3 cards to fit in the middle thus 1/6 of the time that you get a royal with the A -10 on the outside will it be sequential (remember this is only if you get the royal) as from the get go the chance of a sequential in either direction is 1/60 (assuming again you get the royal) but you all know what assume means -FTWD (for those who don't) assume = ass u me -This is one case where the psychological play might be better than the mathematical play? I know when there are runners at the corners (1st and 3rd) I go for the hit (i.e., A-10 either direction on the outside) I play for it.
If I have misse danything please let me know. Thanks
mroejacks <rgmustain@aol.
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.
>
>
> Sorry, failed to complete the thought.
>
> So, following Mickey's example, the average Royal would be 4000 X 5
+ 50,000
> = 70,000 / 6 = 11,666.
>
> Certainly, holding the AT in the proper position is correct over
just the A,
> penalty cards notwithstanding. Probably, it's better than anything
less than
> an inside straight with three high cards.
When I wanted to determine the required strategy changes for the
sequential royals at Circus Circus (aces and eights) I used Wolf
Video Poker (WVP). You can download it and try it for free at
wolfvideopoker.
Dick
------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
