--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.
>
> Brian wrote: I was playing this game on the slant tops at the Palms
> today when this
> interesting situation occurred, I got dealt a hand in which the 10c
was
> on the extreme left and the Ac was on the extreme left ... there
were
> no discernable penalty cards, so I held both. Was this the correct
> play or should I have tossed the 10c anyway?
>
>
> You probably made the right play. I'm not sure what the basic pay
> schedule was or how big the sequential was. VPW allows you to
analyze
> sequential royals. This is a game you should analyze BEFORE you sit
down
> to play, as there will be a lot of different plays affected by the
> sequential.
>
> With no penalty cards, the other three cards must have been
specifically
> 679 or 689, with at least two different suits involved and none of
them
> suited with the 'AT'.
>
> Pesach wondered how you could hold both cards. The 10 was in
position 1
> and the A was in position 5. It's not hard to hold both.
>
> Bob Dancer
>
> For a 3-day free trial of Video Poker for Winners, the best video
poker
> computer trainer ever invented, go to //www.videopokerfor
>
Thanks for the reply, Bob. Yes, obviously I meant the Ac was on the
right in position 5 and yes, also, to the non-penalty cards. It
seemed intuitive that the hold, if not correct, must be very, very
close to correct. I have only "Win Poker" at my disposal, so
analysis was impossible. You say VPW allows for sequential royal
analysis? Very strong selling point, indeed! TY again for taking
the time to comment on the play.
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___