Mike is WRONG. With the example I gave, a 96.5% game approximately, there is simply NO WAY a random game with such a small jackpot ($4000 royal) that hits only about 1 in 40,000 can make up the approximate $7,000 expected loss. MAYBE in a short run, but over an extended period of time, your odds of coming out ahead would be worse than the powerball lottery.
I've silently read the posts on this site for years, and never commented, but I would like to thank Michael Shackleford and Bob Dancer for the hard work and great advice. I'll take skill over blind hope any day.
I also seriously believe that some of the writers who criticize them may actually work for a casino and desire to spread disinformation. I can't imagine anyone who really understands the math would suggest you could come out ahead in the long run on a 6-5 game--THAT IS PALPABLY FALSE
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (38) |
