[vpFREE] Re: Bob Dancer's LV Advisor Column - 8 JAN 2013

 



--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Thomas Barefoot wrote:
>
> --you can't win at VP unless you have an over 100% EV.
> --Luck WON'T change this in VP over an extended period because the top jackpot is not big

I'm sorry but that is palpably false.
You CAN win at VP with far less than 100% VP. You can sit down at a dollar 6-5 progressive with an $8000 meter (still way under 100%) and hit the progressive with your first 5 coins while your pal at the next machine loses $500 an hour on the Loose Deuces progressive-a positive play.
Luck CAN change this "over an extended period". Lets take 20 years- an extended period in any book. Ralph Retiree retires to LV and enjoys playing VP at his local casino once a week for 2 hours at 500 hph. Over the next 20 years he plays a million hands. All of it on dollar "negative" games like NSUD, 9/6/90 JOB, under 100% progressives. Good paying games but all negative. However luck rewards Ralph with a few more royals and a few more 4 deuces than he is "supposed" to get so ends his life as a sizable winner "over an extended period".
Conversely, Ralph could find the Valley's only $25 Loose Deuces machine, blow his $500,000 life savings in 6 months (or less) and end up at the Shade Tree shelter.
Can someone really tell Ralph "it doesn't matter if you win or lose"?
Really?

__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (22)
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___