I told Shack basically the same thing and he really didn't have a problem with it. And as far as would a gambler rather be lucky or smart, I think most of us here understand that they first need to put in the time to educate themselves about vp, casinos, and most importantly--themselves prior to giving the game a serious go. That's the smart part. Then, you need to decide what approach best fits the skills you've acquired. When I went thru this procedure, I found that luck played a huge part in what I wanted to accomplish and what allowed me to be successful, but I couldn't have done any of it without being "smart" first. So I think people need to accept that no one thing will get you to where you want to be in vp, and to understand that different players require different levels of each depending on their own particular circumstances.
----- Reply message -----
From: "mike" melbedewy1226@hotmail.com>
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [vpFREE] Re: Bob Dancer's LV Advisor Column - 8 JAN 2013
Date: Sat, Jan 12, 2013 5:21 am
Now if Shackleford said "Don't worry about if you will win or lose, just play games where you have an edge" I don't think any of us would take issue with that. But to say "it doesn't matter if you win or lose" betrays a certain intellectual and ideological snobbishness which some of us find both false and grating.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (1) |
