With any given bankroll, what are your thoughts on playing higher
denominations on lower variance games? For example, given bankroll X, play
$0.50 DDB, but switch to BP if you move up to $1. Is there any validity to
this?
What about switching denomination as a "last ditch effort" to make up
losses. For example, you've been playing $0.50 DDB and exhausted $800 of
your $1000 bankroll for that day's play. What are your thoughts on moving
up to $1 or $2 in hopes of hitting quad and making up most of your losses,
of course whilst also realising that you might loose your last $200 really
quickly if you don't get lucky?
Finally, do any of you switch games depending on how well or poorly a
session is going? For example, maybe after gaining $500 playing JOB, switch
to DDB in hopes of further increasing your gains using your $500 profit as
your new bankroll for the higher risk game? Or, after losing $500 playing
JOB, switch to DDB in hopes of getting lucky and making up that loss more
quickly? Or, after getting lucky early playing DDB and winning $500, switch
to BP or JOB to play a bit longer but with less of the risk of a high
variance game?
Or, should we just stick to one game, one denomination, and play it
throughout the entire session...come what may?
I'd be interested to hear your opinions on any of these lines of thought.
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
