The cost per royal is about double on the Frank-n-Bob. Of course you could win a bigger royal than usual, but if you're cost sensitive you might want to think twice before kicking it up a notch. At least Frank-n-Bob and M have provided another option. Options are good. Maybe a 9-6 Double-Double-Bonus with 1% progressive would keep the 9=6 players happy?
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Frank" <frank@...> wrote:
>
> Well that's a tricky question to ask of me, since as most already know I have little to no experience with solo gambling.
>
> For near absolute safety: I recommend about a $20,000 bankroll (quarters) and at least 3 partners.
>
> I'm sure that's a completely absurd suggestion for a regular gambler that doesn't merely err on the side of caution but glues it to your eyeballs.
>
> I know you asked me, but how about one of you other solo gurus answer this. I'm too risk adverse and biased to give good advice on solo bankroll requirements.
>
> ~FK
>
> --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, patricia swenson <jackessiebabe@> wrote:
> >
> > From: Frank <frank@>
> > Subject: [vpFREE] Re: Seats added at M
> > To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Thursday, June 30, 2011, 11:45 PM
> >
> >
> >
> > <<<......Note: Many of the games reach 102.5% in the low $3,000 range if you count cash-back, meter-rise, and mailer. Why is it that everyone seems to forget that all the perks apply to these games that apply to non-progressives and the meter goes up while you play???
> >
> > ~FK
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > Perhaps it's because as�"everyone" watches the meter rise, they are also watching their bankroll shrink at an alarming rate.
> > �
> > BTW, assuming play on one of the less volatile games, BP (96.87%) what would you suggest as a sensible bankroll to carry, to avoid risk of ruin? �That is, �if� the�player is determined to sit at the prog. bank until he, or someone else, hits the royal, on that game.
> > �
> > ~Babe
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
