If I had any reason to think that you'd read my note in the first place, I'd
take your note a bit more seriously. But instead you create another strawman
and then flail at it. I have not challenged any of the math that you feel I
do not understand, and find it odd that you'd consider my opipnion to be
"voodoo". As near as I can tell we both subscribe to the same "in the
long-range" bible.
If you are lucky enough to never have been at a smoothly working BJ table,
only to have some drunk or bling festooned 20-something stagger up to tour
table and disrupt its flow, I am happy for you ... sonewhat incredulous, but
happy.
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 2:08 PM, ma18ks <89109.nv@gmail.com> wrote:
> **
>
>
>
>
> The term "audacity" was used under the assumption that one of the primary
> purposes of this forum is to distribute useful information on the subject of
> advantage play. My reply to your post was less about calling you out.
> Rather, it was intended to elicit a response from my fellow members who
> understand - or at least embrace - the basic tenets of mathematics, and
> disregard misinformation and other "voodoo." The number of quality replies
> is encouraging.
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
