Rprosdc wrote:
>A reaffirmation of my initial statement of belief that the long run impact
>of what other players do is insignificant also prefaced my subsequent post:
>
>
>
>"For what it is worth, I agree that the play of other individuals at the
>table, in the long run, has no impact on my success. As long as they don't
>jump into the game mid-shoe (thus disrupting it's flow)."
???
You seem to think that "As long as they don't jump into the game
mid-shoe" doesn't qualify "the play of other individuals at the table,
in the long run, has no impact on my success." I'm sorry, but that
second statement can only mean that you believe that other individuals
jumping into the game mid-shoe has an impact on your long run success,
which is a statement about mathematics that no knowledgeable person is
going to agree with. If you don't mean that and you want anyone else
to understand you, you're going to have to use different words. Is
there some non-mathematical way that other individuals jumping into
the game mid-shoe has an impact on your long run success?
