>gamb00ler <gamb00ler@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> I have heard from one or two other players that if you receive an invitation from a property that has previously "86'd" you, that you are now free to visit the property in question. I have often wondered if an invitation from a property in such a situation has the effect of negating the 86'ing.
>>
>> Tom, has your lawyer had made any comment on this point that you could share with us?
>
>i was going to point out that it's legally questionable whether the
>86'ing of a skilled player who is neither disruptive nor disorderly
>can be enforced at all. recently the north las vegas municipal court
>ruled that it couldn't.
>
>http://bj21.com/al/Order%20to%20Dismiss.PDF
>
>then i saw the name of the defendant in that case and realized that
>tom probably knows about it already ;)
>
>go tom! we appreciate your efforts.
I don't know what to make of that ruling. It makes me wonder what the
casino may do. If they may not 86 a player just for playing, may they
even stop anyone from playing?
