Oh, he loves those. I'm suing both Jerry's Nugget and the Suncoast
and I received several invitations from both of them after they 86ed
me. He believes they do negate the 86.
>Tom Robertson <007@...> wrote:
>> In November 2009, I was playing at the Suncoast to maintain my mailer. I was approached by a supervisor and security and was told that I was not allowed to play video poker there, any more.
>. . .
>> In January 2010, I was there and asked for a room comp. That I was still getting invitations from them was one reason I felt free to do this in spite of what I had been told in November and I had been there several times in the meantime, so I was totally surprised by what then happened. Security surrounded me. I was asked if I had been 86ed. I said I hadn't been. This conversation was repeated a few times. I finally volunteered the information that in November, I had been told not to play video poker machines. He responded "so you HAVE been 86ed!"
>------------------
>I have heard from one or two other players that if you receive an invitation from a property that has previously "86'd" you, that you are now free to visit the property in question. I have often wondered if an invitation from a property in such a situation has the effect of negating the 86'ing.
>
>Tom, has your lawyer had made any comment on this point that you could share with us?
>
>Thanks and
>
>G'luck all,
>Gamb00ler
