gamb00ler <gamb00ler@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I have heard from one or two other players that if you receive an invitation from a property that has previously "86'd" you, that you are now free to visit the property in question. I have often wondered if an invitation from a property in such a situation has the effect of negating the 86'ing.
>
> Tom, has your lawyer had made any comment on this point that you could share with us?
i was going to point out that it's legally questionable whether the
86'ing of a skilled player who is neither disruptive nor disorderly
can be enforced at all. recently the north las vegas municipal court
ruled that it couldn't.
http://bj21.com/al/Order%20to%20Dismiss.PDF
then i saw the name of the defendant in that case and realized that
tom probably knows about it already ;)
go tom! we appreciate your efforts.
