Re: [vpFREE] Maniac at Stations

 

It is rare for a casino to 86 a video poker player.
They usually do the following.
First thing is you get lower level mailers.
Next thing is you get no mailers whatsoever.
Finally you will find that your slot card has been invalidated.

When all of the above have been implemented you can no longer be a threat to the casino, so there is no need to trespass you.
If you are an advantage player, you will find a happier hunting
ground and leave on your own accord.

Regards
A.P.



 

From: "James Beam funny.young.guy@gmail.com [vpFREE]" <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
To: "vpFREE@yahoogroups.com" <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 1:17:25 PM
Subject: Re: [vpFREE] Maniac at Stations

 
I'm OK with the lack of mailers. But my question was more about being backed-off and/or 86d. This used to happen to me all the time as a card-counter. So I assumed that the same would apply to VP players. It was blatantly obvious what he was doing. Stations will eventually kick him out . . . right?




On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Albert Pearson ehpee@rogers.com [vpFREE] <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
I would imagine that the player in question doesn't receive the top level mailers from the property. Isn't that the action taken by most Las Vegas casinos these days ?

A.P.

From: "James Beam funny.young.guy@gmail.com [vpFREE]" <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
To: "vpFREE@yahoogroups.com" <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 11:47:26 AM
Subject: [vpFREE] Maniac at Stations

 
I was at a Stations recently and I saw a player at the 100%+ machines. He was seated between two machines, playing both at the same time, with a Boarding Pass in each machine. And he played *fast*, banging away on the buttons like a maniac (on both machines). He was frantic enough where people would stop and stare for a bit, myself included. As far as I can tell, he didn't make any mistakes and it was impressive for the speed and two machines.

Whatever is the *opposite* of "under the radar" or "discrete", is what this guy was. It was no secret what he was doing.

I thought that this type of play was discouraged by Stations? I thought that this kind of play would get you backed off? He was there for at least 2 hours, so I don't think it was a lack of opportunity on Station's part. 

Is Stations more tolerant than I assumed to this kind of play?





__._,_.___
Posted by: Albert Pearson <ehpee@rogers.com>
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a New Topic • Messages in this topic (6)

.

__,_._,___