[vpFREE] RE: Today I was dealt a Sequential Royal Flush!

 

A million dollars in the bank after 25 years is statistical significant enough for me.  But that's just me – I was an English major, not a math major.
 
------------------------------------------
Jean $¢ott, Frugal Gambler
http://queenofcomps.com/
You can read my blog at
http://jscott.lvablog.com/
 
From: RWS
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 3:30 PM
Subject: [SPAM]Re: [vpFREE] RE: Today I was dealt a Sequential Royal Flush!
 
 

Well congratulations on your results.   But that information doesn't address my original observation that those who play VP advantage really don't understand that they are not playing in the long term as far as statistical significance.    It's very likely that in your 25 years of play, your number of hands doesn't approach the long term e
From: Queen of Comps <queenofcomps@cox.net>
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, November 9, 2013 4:54 PM
Subject: Re: [vpFREE] RE: Today I was dealt a Sequential Royal Flush!
 
 
Playing over 25 years, only on positive VP plays (which include all cash extras, i.e., free play but not including comps), we have won an average of 40K per year.
 
------------------------------------------
Jean $¢ott, Frugal Gambler
http://queenofcomps.com/
You can read my blog at
http://jscott.lvablog.com/
 
From: RWS
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: [vpFREE] RE: Today I was dealt a Sequential Royal Flush!
 
 
How is it that anyone feels their playtime at video poker even approaches long term math?   (millions of trials)  I have yet to see anyone explain that on this site.


__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (11)
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___