---In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, RWS <realcaman92373@...> wrote:
Well congratulations on your results. But that information doesn't address my original observation that those who play VP advantage really don't understand that they are not playing in the long term as far as statistical significance. It's very likely that in your 25 years of play, your number of hands doesn't approach the long term either.
... and previously:
How is it that anyone feels their playtime at video poker even approaches long term math? (millions of trials) I have yet to see anyone explain that on this site.
----------
So, RWS, what is your concept of "long-term" based on?
Is it framed from some Sagan-esque expert who once opined that the long-term in video poker involves billions and billions of hands?
Or perhaps it reflects the experience of a player lacking the discipline that gives rise to reliably profitable vp play (and who assumes as a consequence that no one else can reasonably aspire to such play).
The most realistic and tangible concept of the "long term", when it comes to video poker, is the length of play required to have strong confidence of a positive result. This has been discussed in this forum by the likes of nightoftheiguana.
Those discussions involve the statistical concept of N0. The bottom line is that an active player who keeps a rein on variance, and consistently plays at a respectable edge, can look for a positive play outcome over a fairly standard course of play (conceivably under 1 millions hands, for a game like Jacks or Better) with strong confidence.
For you to suggest that an adept player, like Jean, couldn't possibly be playing into the "long term", even after 25 years, betrays a surprisingly limited imagination where it comes to vp possibilities and potential.
From: Queen of Comps <queenofcomps@...>
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, November 9, 2013 4:54 PM
Subject: Re: [vpFREE] RE: Today I was dealt a Sequential Royal Flush!
... and previously:
How is it that anyone feels their playtime at video poker even approaches long term math? (millions of trials) I have yet to see anyone explain that on this site.
----------
So, RWS, what is your concept of "long-term" based on?
Is it framed from some Sagan-esque expert who once opined that the long-term in video poker involves billions and billions of hands?
Or perhaps it reflects the experience of a player lacking the discipline that gives rise to reliably profitable vp play (and who assumes as a consequence that no one else can reasonably aspire to such play).
The most realistic and tangible concept of the "long term", when it comes to video poker, is the length of play required to have strong confidence of a positive result. This has been discussed in this forum by the likes of nightoftheiguana.
Those discussions involve the statistical concept of N0. The bottom line is that an active player who keeps a rein on variance, and consistently plays at a respectable edge, can look for a positive play outcome over a fairly standard course of play (conceivably under 1 millions hands, for a game like Jacks or Better) with strong confidence.
For you to suggest that an adept player, like Jean, couldn't possibly be playing into the "long term", even after 25 years, betrays a surprisingly limited imagination where it comes to vp possibilities and potential.
From: Queen of Comps <queenofcomps@...>
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, November 9, 2013 4:54 PM
Subject: Re: [vpFREE] RE: Today I was dealt a Sequential Royal Flush!
Playing over 25 years, only on positive VP plays (which include all cash extras, i.e., free play but not including comps), we have won an average of 40K per year.
------------------------------------------
Jean $¢ott, Frugal Gambler
http://queenofcomps.com/
You can read my blog at
http://jscott.lvablog.com/
Jean $¢ott, Frugal Gambler
http://queenofcomps.com/
You can read my blog at
http://jscott.lvablog.com/
From: RWS
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: [vpFREE] RE: Today I was dealt a Sequential Royal Flush!
How is it that anyone feels their playtime at video poker even approaches long term math? (millions of trials) I have yet to see anyone explain that on this site.
__._,_.___
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (12) |
.
__,_._,___
