[vpFREE] RE: RE: Jean Scott's Frugal Vegas LVA BLOG - 13 NOV 2013

 

 



---In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, <nightoftheiguana2000@...> wrote:

Jean wrote: "There is never a zero chance of going broke."


"With the Kelly system there is zero chance of going broke, and a very reduced risk of bankroll depletion....."

 

Well, not exactly.  The Kelly system does promise a zero chance of going broke, but only if you can continually resize your bets downward if you start to lose.  Betting strictly according to the Kelly system requires a re-sizing of bets after every change in bankroll size, even down to fractions of a penny bets if you run particularly bad.  (All of this assumes you have an advantage.  The Kelly bet size for a negative expectation bet is $0.)

In the real world, this kind of bet re-sizing just isn't possible, particularly with VP.  If you start out with some fixed amount of money, *and you maintain a fixed bet level*, you definitely have a non-zero chance of going broke, no matter how much money you start out with.

On the positive side, if you start out with a large enough bankroll relative to bet size, and a strong enough advantage, then we might be able to say your chance of going broke is "just about impossible", even if you can't re-size bets downward.

 

EE 

__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (3)
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___