If you have a case, it's usually a big mistake to start yakking to the public. Casinos will usually pay off much more if you agree to a gag order. The public never hears about the big juicy settlements. "Going to the press" is a valuable threat, but once executed, the cat is out of the bag, so to speak. The value is in the threat, not the execution.
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "vp_wiz" <harry.porter@...> wrote:
>
> I've got no dog in this "fight", vpplayer88, so I'm willing to accept your claim that some players were innocently excluded from the Revel promo, until such time as hard data to the contrary comes to light.
>
> But, frankly, what I will note is that of what I've read, it's clear to me that at least some players were legitimately bumped, having been observed engaging in the Ult-X "vulnerability" to hide wins.
>
> As to others who may have been inappropriately netted, if these exist on any number, I'm stunned by their discretion in not speaking out of turn. In past circumstances, even where a player intends to seek a legal remedy, they can be usually counted on to be sufficiently forthcoming with general details of their indignation, even while observing appropriate discretion, such that one readily gets that someone was wronged. in this case, I haven't seen zip except out of the one player who came forth with vague details of his and his buddy's circumstances that, with modest insight, strongly smacks of the Ult-X scam in operation.
>
> As I said, I'm a largely disinterested party. I write merely to suggest why someone who's perused the public discussion might have doubts that "innocents" are involved.
>
>
> --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "vpplayer88" <vpplayer88@> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Because that's not what happened. People playing big slots were banned for playing big slots. No reason was given but all they did is play big. Your characterization is false.
> >
> > --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rob.singer1111@" <rob.singer1111@> wrote:
> > >
> > > OK we've heard from all sides now, so why don't we just wait and see what happens. Maybe these anonymous gamblers with "pending lawsuits" who supposedly were told out of the blue and for no reason whatsoever: "too bad fellas....you lost, you played 100% by the rules, but it's Revel's decision not to give you the rebate" will eventually battle this out in public so we can all see what's going on.
> > >
> > > ----- Reply message -----
> > > From: "vpplayer88" <vpplayer88@>
> > > To: <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
> > > Subject: [vpFREE] Re: Bob Dancer's LV Advisor Column - 9 JUL 2013
> > > Date: Wed, Jul 10, 2013 12:30 pm
> > > Put your money where your mouth is. I know you are wrong, lets make a bet. We can escrow the money to a trusted source sonce you dont know me.I know several of the legitimate players that were removed, and they aren't talking to the press because of developing lawsuits.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Also, I know it's a rumor, but many people are saying you are consulting for the revel on this promo. Can you go on the record and officially deny this?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
>
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (14) |
