Dancer writes in his column: "Whether you like it or not, the casino is
hyper-paranoid about players trying to cheat on their rebate offer. If you
give them no reason to suspect you are "cheating" (as defined by them),
you'll be fine."
And here we have an excellent example of why to treat anything Dancer says
with a huge grain of salt. He has no evidence to back this assertion.
Assuring players that they'll be fine as they consider risking $100k,
without solid reason to believe that assurance is valid, is highly
irresponsible.
I personally believe that the complaints on WoV, by posters claiming to be
innocent players, pass the sniff test. I don't believe the lack of more
widespread public comment proves anything, as my experience with lawyers is
that their first advice is always to shut up about the case.
It's not impossible that it's a well-constructed disinformation campaign,
but let's just say that I would cheerfully take vpplayer88's side of his
proposed bet.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (2) |
