--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "vpplayer88" <vpplayer88@...> wrote:
>
> For those of you that didn't listen to gambling with an edge yet, Bob Dancer
was asked whether he had a consulting relationship with Revel. His answer seemed
to basically say that he isn't currently being paid by them, but is looking to
work for them in the future. In addition, he was in contact with management at
Revel before the promotion began.
>
> He needs to go on the record and state when this contact took place. In my
opinion, if it was before any radio show discussion of Revel, then not admitting
this conflict of interest is an extreme violation of his audience's trust. It
was definitely before he wrote his recent Revel article, in which he should have
explicitly stated his campaign for work with the casino he was writing about.
>
> He acted as if not officially being paid by them excused his behavior. It
doesn't. He sold out the player community and violated the trust of his
audience. His excuse, that he didn't want a casino to go bankrupt, is just pure
nonsense. If he could take enough money to bankrupt a casino, he would do it in
a heartbeat.
>
Bob's loyalties have long, long been known.
I am amazed anyone in the gambling world, aside from
the casinos, speaks to him.
QZ
Amazed is a good word. But, I like Stunned, better. But who's counting?
CF
------------------------------------
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (3) |
