I can take the heat for my opinion-Never suggested banning rob singer.
I just reiterated VP Free Moderater's original concern of disruption by rob singer.
I do not appreciate the personal attack by card father for my opinion.
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, John White <depbonus@...> wrote:
>
> I'm all for freedom. But last time I
> checked we live in a very conformist country that has things like the
> Sedition Act and the Patriot Acts on the books as law. Now mine is
> the kind of comment I'd expect to get pushed to the other forum.
> Singer's. however controversial, does have to do with VP. But I'll
> continue. . . Various free speech activist groups rank the good ole
> USA anywhere from 24th to 36th in the world.
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: "Albert J. Roth, Jr." <alrothjr@...>
> To: "vpFREE@yahoogroups.com" <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 1:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [vpFREE] rob singer posts
>
>
> Â
> I can only hope that your kidding about banning anyone. It is entirely understandable to ban someone should they become abusive, however, it becomes your choice to read or not to read Mr. Singer's posts. Last time I checked, we live in a country that not only accepts but often time encourages alternate opinions. Just because someone differs in your opinions, or dare I say, have a mind of their own and is not afraid to speak it is not a call to arms for banning. If you do not like Mr. Singers posts, then simply do not rad them, personally I find his insight and understanding of the game (remember it is a game) helpful.Â
>
> ________________________________
> From: jim_mason7 <7711-jimmason@...>
> To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 9:37 PM
> Subject: [vpFREE] rob singer posts
>
>
> Â
>
> I think the the vp moderator was right about his initial concerns with Rob Singer responses(3 and counting) to this subject being disruptive. I would respectfully suggest that Mr Singer be barred from any further participation on this thread so the rest of the group may enjoy this subject without controversy.
>
> --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rob.singer1111@..." <rob.singer1111@> wrote:
> >
> > I don't think gamblinman was dissing the math as much as he was the exercise. Besides, everyone who plays a vp machine inside a casino is gambling, not all advantage players win, and not everyone else loses.
> >
> >
> > "gamblinman46825" wrote:
> > > > This whole subject is drivel and serves little purpose in my opinion!
> >
> >
> > Dan Paymar replied:
> > > This fellow's handle "gamblinman" gives us a clue as to why he believes
> > > that the math is "drivel." He's a gambler ...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
