I think one could make a very strong argument that the new M progressive's average return is far higher than that of the Palms Deuce.
Naturally people play VP for more than raw edge and take into consideration things like bankroll requirement and game variance.
If we do go off of pure average edge, I believe the M might win.
And keep in mind, M was put in as a direct request of vpFREE posters. Kinda cool I think.
I'll can see what I can do to preserve the Palms Deuce for all of you. Hay it worked last time.
~FK
P.S. I'm assuming that you would all like me to help preserve the Deuce progressive???
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "mike" <melbedewy1226@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Bob Bartop" <bobbartop@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "pumsparky" <dianalnagy@> wrote:
> > >
> > > New owners, FPDW machines gone. A handful of FPDW will not effect their publicity, the kids that go there do not even play video poker. As for Frank asking the question, Maloof can say anything, it is the majority owners will make that decision.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > Maybe someone else will "adopt" the bank of progressive deuces if the Palms changes. I know Fiesta Rancho used to be a hang out for those players a few years ago. That was a good bank of them if I recall, I often wondered why the casino kept them. I'm not sure what the meter was on them but I seem to recall they frequently reached in the $1200s, even $1300. That's pretty good for a 25-cent FPDW progressive!
> >
> > I dunno, you just have to change with the times, I guess. We all knew it wasn't going to last forever. FPDW for a percent EV at quarters is hardly something to write home about. There are much better plays for quarters around town.
> >
> No there are aren't. Not if by "plays" you mean a game that runs 24/7.
>
