About those canceled interviews.
Bob nixed the cocktail waitress interview. Bob nixed the Singer interview (even if I did it on my own time and only posted it on my web-site). When I say "Bob nixed them" I mean he voiced concerns and opinions that I either did not completely disagree with, or that I did not feel strongly enough about to fight him on.
I may have disagreed, but not ENOUGH to jeopardize my friendship with Bob. I like the guy.
Even though the original idea to do a radio show was mine, and I asked him if he would like to co-host it with me, I have never thought of it as "my show". Bob was instrumental in getting our sponsorships and I simply wouldn't want to dismiss his opinion in favor of mine, when he has been the driving force behind the financial success of the show.
If I have an idea, I pitch it to him. If I then fail to convince him of my point of view, I concede the point and I give him the final word.
He has about 10 times the public experience that I do (most of my career was spent hiding in the shadows), it doesn't make sense to me not to listen to someone that should, in theory, know more on the subject than I do.
I believe the Casino-ology interview is up coming.
~FK
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "mike" <melbedewy1226@...> wrote: Frank-I have to commend you and "Bob" for those M progressives. They are a great asset to the VP community. I hope they last forever. If Palms and other nice payback FPDW plays go away I am going to take a week to learn some of those otherwise horrific games and you will have the "pleasure" of seeing my fat ass at M! PS-What happened to the interviews with Singer and the guy who wrote that Casino-ology book? Hope they don't go the way of the long promised cocktail waitress interview. LOL.
