If the software is defective, they need to go after the vendor to fix the problem. Stop blaming the customers for finding faults in your casino. Also, if you're trying to rate customers to see who you can get the most money from, basing the rating system on whether or not somebody stumbles onto a casino flaw is bogus. That tells you absolutely nothing about their playing abilities. Just look at this example: Frank and Bob are two of the best gamblers in Vegas, and it looks like neither of them were aware of this flaw or they chose not to do it because they thought it might have ramifications, like getting "no-mailed". I also suspect that there is no such flaw in modern software, the software actually identifies "card pullers" because that was an issue in the past and the casino is under the mistaken impression that it needs to halt all mailers to customers that the software identifies as "card pullers" or they are under the mistaken impression that the software can still be fooled by "card pulling".
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Frank" <frank@...> wrote:
>
> I agree with you. I believe it is a limitation of the software suite they purchased which would cost roughly $10,000,000 to replace.
>
> If you take this into consideration, their "fix" for the issue may make more sense. I'm not saying it's right. I'm saying it is understandable.
>
> I'll be camping for the next couple of days, cheers all.
>
> ~FK
>
> --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "irdd3000" <irdd@> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Some have argued that since it is possible it, the casino shouldn't be upset when you do it. That is certainly one way to look at it.
> > >
> >
> > well if pulling cards is important to them, they should be more proactive. they could have freeplay count down while you play it or have "session in progress" when you try to pull your card. either method would fix the problem for the casino instead of being reactionary by blaming the players...
> >
>
