Any game with a big jackpot or two has the same
characteristics Mister Singer is complaining about.
And, his strategy involves taking more shots at the
big one that 'perfect' or other strategies.
So, it seems to a) not make sense to me to
complain about a high progressive game and
b) contradictory to Rob's own strategy to not
play these games.
Sour grapes or something, it does seem to me.
--- On Mon, 5/30/11, rob.singer1111 <rob.singer1111@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: rob.singer1111 <rob.singer1111@yahoo.com>
Subject: [vpFREE] Re: The New Progressives At The M
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, May 30, 2011, 4:00 PM
The Joker Poker progressives were seeded higher than the other games. And how many people know expert JP strategy, let alone the changes needed to theoretically be playing the thing correctly anyway?
These so-called "teams" have too many seats to fill to guarantee they'll hit it and even if they do, with all the seats and the lousy paytables they'll more than likely pound themselves into oblivion instead.
They ought to change those misleading billboards to "Pot Shot Heaven".
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "mike" <melbedewy1226@...> wrote:
>
>
> Since the Joker Poker is now at 102% plus freebies I wonder why these much heralded "teams" aren't banging away at all 20 machines 24/7?
> LOL.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
