thanks, in the old days when many local joints had full pay 2s I got to see many spread sheets on hold etc. if the joints were holding over 1 % on those machines they would still be on the floor. from what I saw it was closer to 1/2 %.
Sent from Windows Mail
From: Albert Pearson ehpee@rogers.com [vpFREE]
Sent: Monday, February 9, 2015 9:58 AM
To: Albert Pearson ehpee@rogers.com [vpFREE]
16-10-4 deuces (NSU) is about a 1% leak from full pay (15-9-5) deuces. So for 5000 hands at quarters you'd be leaking about 0.01 x 5000 x $1.25 = about $62.50 per 5000 hands. At dollars you'd be leaking about $250 per 5000 hands. Likewise, 9-6-4 double double bonus is about a 3% leak from 10-7-5 double bonus. True, with double double you hope to make back about half of that on the kicker hands, but in the short term that may or may not happen. Aces with a kicker has a cycle of about 16,236 while 4, 3 or 2's with a kicker has a cycle of about 6,983.
I strongly repeat you have to add into these the amount you are leaking due to not being able to deliver computer perfect play in the casino environment. The average gambler might be leaking an additional 2% just in play mistakes. I think about 2% is the number IGT comes up with from analyzing their aggregate machine data.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Posted by: <hjclasvegas6969@yahoo.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (6) |
