Re: [vpFREE] question about results after 2000 hands of Jacks o r Better

 

Those must be really casual gamblers if they are leaking 2% due to mistakes at VP. When I train for a new game on iPad Winpoker, I play 1,000 hands of "intuition" based on the paytable before actually looking at a strategy. I find it helps me across a variety of games getting used to the difference between 6 and 7 on a flush, 4 and 5 on a straight, 2 and 1 on two pair etc.

I don't think I've ever had an expected return under 99.2% of maximum just playing intuitively during those test runs (and I won't attempt a game in the casino until I'm seeing 99.9% or better). I can't imagine how poorly you'd have to play to be leaking 2% of your handle. I'll routinely see error rates of 5-7% during those test runs but the expected return is still over 99% of possible. It's not like I'm throwing away trips to keep a three-card flush.

> On Feb 9, 2015, at 9:58 AM, "nightoftheiguana2000@yahoo.com [vpFREE]" <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
> I strongly repeat you have to add into these the amount you are leaking due to not being able to deliver computer perfect play in the casino environment. The average gambler might be leaking an additional 2% just in play mistakes. I think about 2% is the number IGT comes up with from analyzing their aggregate machine data.
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___

Posted by: C <clementiyn@yahoo.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (5)

.

__,_._,___