True, assuming a ten hasn't been discarded, but the frequency is less.
----- kelso kelso1600@hotmail.com [vpFREE] <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>I may be reading this wrong and may not know the whole thread but I believe the chances of getting a royal on the redraw holding zero cards is greater than the dealt royal -- 1 out of 385,000 -- due to the fact that the remaining 47 cards contains more high cards than the original deal since you generally hold high cards on the initial draw.
>
> > To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
> > From: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 21:31:24 -0400
> > Subject: RE: [vpFREE] Re: I just got my first dealt royal!
> >
> > You are indeed very lucky catherinejcohen. I have been playing video poker for about 30 years and have never had a redraw royal (and never will). Perhaps I am being a bit fatalistic but that's how I am. While the chance of a dealt Royal is "only" about 1 in 650,000 the chance of a redraw royal is less than 1 in 20 million. You have a greater probability of winning most states lotto games in one try than redrawing a royal in one hand (with correct play). As a matter of fact if I owned a casino I would offer double pay (8000 coins) on a redraw royal. That move would generate great publicity for my casino and I would probably win more money. The reason why is obvious: once in a while a patron might redraw to a royal instead of holding a non-paying hand such as a low pair. His logic "a pair of 3's needs improvement to pay and a redraw needs improvement to pay - at least if I improve I might get 8000 coins". As I said I'm fatalistic and I predict no casino is going to use my idea.
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> > Posted by: nordo123@aol.com
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > vpFREE Links: http://www.west-point.org/users/usma1955/20228/V/Links.htm
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Posted by: 007 <007@embarqmail.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (18) |
