As much as an answer as to simply presume they don't like "lucky" players.
There's not much in the sense of property history conveyed in the original post. If a property no-mails a player after a single royal, no matter their win/loss history to-date, it's clearly a short sighted move.
However, if you presume a player has 200,000+ hands of play in the casino and they have failed to establish themselves as a profitable player, there begins to be cause for a bias that they aren't likely to become a profitable player.
---In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, <bornloser1537@...> wrote :
Just to apply sense (where there is none) and logic (which seems to be in such short supply for Casino management), can their reasoning be that a person's getting a RF and having the 40 Bennies counted out to them (it is a nice feeling!) is incentive enough for them to return? Thus, the cutting off of "other" incentives?
I certainly don't subscribe to that reasoning, but can that be an answer?
..... bl
I certainly don't subscribe to that reasoning, but can that be an answer?
..... bl
__._,_.___
Posted by: harry.porter@verizon.net
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (5) |
Yahoo Groups
New - View Group Photos by Time or Location
Enjoy your group's photos beautifully arranged by date or place
.
__,_._,___
