Ugh. An already complicated rule I gave needs modification.
This:
>The best play for a hand which has an ace in the right position, a
>high card which is offsuit with the ace and which blocks the
>sequential aces, a ten which is offsuit with the ace, and 2 cards
>below a ten which are offsuit with the ace is, assuming all 4 cards
>besides the ace aren't suited and no 3 of them form a better straight
>flush draw, to hold the ace.
Should be:
The best play for a hand which has an ace in the right position, a
high card which is offsuit with the ace and which blocks the
sequential aces, a ten which is offsuit with the ace, and 2 cards
below a ten which are offsuit with the ace is, assuming all 4 cards
besides the ace aren't suited, no 3 of them form a better straight
flush draw, there isn't a ten that's suited with a jack and there
isn't both a 9 and a 7, or there isn't a ten that's suited with a jack
which has a flush penalty and there is not a 7, 8, or 9, to hold the
ace.
On second thought, it's too complicated and worthless. It took me 20
minutes just to figure out how to word it. Forget it.
Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (28) |