Howard Stern wrote:
>With no strategy changes it would be 1 in 306,369.
>The only strategy change I know of is to break a full house with three Aces in position.
That's the main one with the aces at reset. There used to be
progressives that got high enough to make many changes, including
holding 2 aces over a full house, which brings the cycle down to
around 260,000. There are 2 other minor changes that I know of with
the aces at reset:
The best play for a hand which has an ace in the right position, a
high card which is offsuit with the ace and which blocks the
sequential aces, a ten which is offsuit with the ace, and 2 cards
below a ten which are offsuit with the ace is, assuming all 4 cards
besides the ace aren't suited and no 3 of them form a better straight
flush draw, to hold the ace.
The best play for a hand which has an ace in the right position, a
jack which is offsuit with the ace and which doesn't block the
sequential aces, a ten and a 2 through a 6 which are suited with the
jack, and a 2 through a 6 which are offsuit with the ace and the jack
is to hold the ace and the jack.
Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (27) |