My 2 cents. I use vpfree2 to find the "best" game at the casino I am at. I am a low budget guy, so I want to play the VP that should allow me to lose the slowest. I dont like slots, so even if the "best" is a 96% machine, it would still be better than NOT playing anything
Sent from my iPhone
On May 29, 2013, at 9:57 AM, "nordo123@aol.com" <Nordo123@aol.com> wrote:
>
> I have a problem with vpfree2 listing 99%+ games but less than 100% as good games. They are not. Any game with under 100%
> return is a bad game. Even games like 15-11 deuces, 9-5 double joker, full pay super aces, 16-10 ugly deuces, 9-6 jacks or better
> are bad games. I realize they may be the best games avalible but they are still bad games and should not be listed. I would make an
> exception if the cash back brings it to over 100%.There are plenty of 10-7 double bonus, 10-6 DDB, full pay deuces etc to list.
> I know my suggestion probably will fall on deaf ears with the vpfree2 administrator, I am expressing my opinion only. One last thought,
> if over 99% games are still listed do not call games with under 100% return as "good". Leave the "good" title to the over 100% games.
> Thank you for listening to me.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> vpFREE Links: http://www.west-point.org/users/usma1955/20228/V/Links.htm
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (24) |
