If you walk up and pickpocket ploppy, you get the same result. If this is truly your consequentialist philosophy it's a wonder you're not in prison by now.
I suspect that's not your actual philosophy but you've argued yourself into a corner, and you're either too ashamed to admit a mistake on an anonymous forum, or you are reveling in the eristic...
> --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "vpplayer88" <@...> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > I don't think so. Both people are exploiting weaknesses in the ploppy, either in terms of knowledge or bankroll or time.
> >
> > It's an active passive distinction I don't believe in. If you let somebody drown by not throwing them a life vest I think it's morally equivalent to throwing them overboard without a vest in the first place. I believe in consequentialism so only the final outcome matters. In either case ploppy loses money and ap makes money.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (21) |
