I believe this is essentially correct.
If we were starting with multipliers of 1, 1, and 12, the
resulting hand may easily leave us wishing we could play
the first two lines differently than the one with a 12x
multiplier.
This means we are "forced" to misplay one or two hands
(or all three if we simply have no clue to begin with).
This situation is going to happen more often with more
lines.
But the difference is really small.
"In case you haven't heard, Ultimate X is ungodly difficult to calculate. There's a lot of fancy schmancy clever tricks used to explicitly calculate the payback."
As for solving the game....
It's not easy, but its not quite so hard as Mr W.O.O. would
have you believe as long as you are willing to have a good
but not perfect solution. (within 0.1%).
QZ
[vpFREE] Re: Ultimate X: Has anyone else seen 9/6 Jacks, 8/5 Bonus, and 10/6/5 DB?
__._,_.___
MARKETPLACE
.
__,_._,___