--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Mickey" <mickeycrimm@...> wrote:
>
>
> Theres only 3 possible scenarios:
>
> A. The house was making some good money.
>
> B. The house was losing money
>
> C. The house was making a little money but figured it wasn't enough so they chopped the payscale.
>
> I think we can nix scenario A right off the bat. They wouldn't pull it down if they were making good money. That leaves B and C.
>
> So they chopped the payscale and it went from being the busiest bank in the casino to the slowest? Is that correct?
>
> Their profit margin darn sure went up! Now they are getting 100% of nothing! But at least it's a hundred percent. ROTFLMAS!
>
Apparently it was (C.)
It started off too goodda thing, with good cashback, multipliers, and bounceback. So they chopped it, from feast to famine. The goose that laid the golden egg turned into an empty shell. The suits decided they were just annoyed with it and yanked it.
Here's something Frank said that I have saved on my hard drive.
"Nameless corporate oversight & pencil pushing micromanagement."
