I thought we were looking for an idea that would serve both the player and the house.
-----Original Message-----
From: 007 <007@embarqmail.com>
To: vpFREE <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Mon, Jul 11, 2011 11:57 am
Subject: Re: [vpFREE] Re: New Game Suggestion for FrankNBobs
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:49:55 -0000, Bob Bartop wrote:
>--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, jaycee5353@... wrote:
>
>>
>> Here is another thought on the meter movement consept.
>> You could reduce the meter when the games go positive.
>> For example at $1800 the meter reduces by 80% for the
>> balance of time until hit.
>>
>>
>
>
>On these games it is more like $2700, not $1800.
>
>Anyway, I don't want to sound rude, but this is a lousy idea. Nothing personal. lol
LOL indeed! You must be expressing a player's perspective. That's
the worst idea I've heard from my point of view, also, but if you
owned the M, would you regard it as a lousy idea? Barley's didn't
tolerate this arrangement for long. I can't imagine often having
$4500 quarter royals being optimal for them.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
