By this logic wouldn't every progressive need to be advertised as "Up to nearly infinity%"? I think having a sign say "occasionally higher" would be really tacky. Anyway what annoys me most about signs is when people advertise using a "." and "¢" and the same time. I have yet to ever buy a water for .69¢.
>
> --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rob.singer1111" <rob.singer1111@> wrote: If the machines are not set to stop at 102.5%, then the signs are wrong. "Up to 102.5%" means exactly that and nothing else. If any of the games ever go anything above that point--which they already have and will continue to do so--then the language is incorrect.
> >
> > I suggest they advertise accurately instead of floating a number out there that they believe will satisfy customers who'll be impressed with 102.5%. "Up to 102.5%, and occasionally higher" would fulfill that bill.
> >
> >
> > --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Frank" <frank@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm sorry, I just don't understand your statement. How was the sign wrong? When we met he actually asked me if the sign was acceptable and I told him it was perfectly fine. I must be missing something.
> > >
> > > We know the bank can reach 102.5% because it has already gotten there at least three times--Even on one of the meters that wasn't seeded, and rose from reset.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
