It was a poor attempt at humor. Considering this bet is 80 times what I
normally play, a $25,000 royal would have been just fine by me.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Peter M. <midnight1626@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Jason Pawloski <jpawloski@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > So anyway, the "optimal strategy" is to play 1 hand at $100. I went
> > to their high limit room and did play one hand of 4 coin $25 deuces
> > wild. Since I was betting short, I would have been PISSED if I hit
> > the royal.
>
> People often say this with regard to short-coin royals but it seems like
> the wrong way of thinking to me. I mean, I get it, it's a psychological
> thing, but consider that once you choose to play short coin, the 4000-coin
> royal is no longer a possible outcome, so why be pissed if you hit the
> maximum payout available to you?
>
> Let alone the thing about the RNG always cycling so you wouldn't
> have gotten the royal if you'd bet max coin, blah blah blah.
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
