Albert Pearson <ehpee@rogers.com> wrote:
> It seems to me that the "Fiasco" was a very small number of people being 86'd from the casino. If you consider how many people would have received and used those coupons, the whole "Fiasco" thing doesn't pass the smell test.
if a casino is sending out security guards and threatening players
with arrest simply because it doesn't like their play - routinely, as
a matter of policy - that's a fiasco.
i'm aware of one player who played at suncoast a total of four times
in his life, two of them on 10x days, no more than a few hours each
time and mostly on $2 machines. the last time he was there, he was
surrounded by security and 86'd.
he eventually talked to a suit on the phone. the suit explained that
since he "only" played on 10x days (false), he must be a AP, so they
86'd him, because that's how they handle APs.
best wishes,
five
